Sunday, July 29, 2018

Hair Crimes



hair crimes



 

From May 17, 2015, that's  "Hair Crimes."  C.I. noted:

A ragged haired Hillary Clinton declares, "Hey, it's me your good friend Hillary.  Vote for me for all the good times we've shared and my new sheep dog do -- the latest in my long line of hair crimes."   Isaiah archives his comics at The World Today Just Nuts.

I don't know what Hillary was thinking with that hair do.  It was bizarre.  I couldn't figure it out.  Was she trying to pull off Farrah Fawcett's post-EXTREMETIES do?  It was like Farrah wore her hair right after THE BURNING BED and then later on a few PLAYBOY covers.  

Now Farrah was a sexy woman.  Hillary was a 67-year-old politician.  




This is C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Friday, July 27, 2018.





My name is Penny Evans and I've just gone twenty-one
A young widow in the war that's being fought in Vietnam
And I have two infant daughters, I thank God I have no sons
Now they say the war is over but I think it's just begun




Today, some say the Iraq War is over.  It's not.  Some fools claim Barack Obama ended it. Yeah, and he closed Guantanamo Bay too.  (He didn't -- Iraq and Gitmo, just two of his many broken promises.  And, spoiler, he didn't end veterans homelessness either despite promising to do so.)

Kevin E. Schmidt (QUAD CITY TIMES) reports:


Although victory over ISIS has been declared in Iraq, American involvement there will remain necessary for years to come, according to Sen. Joni Ernst, because the United States cannot win the peace for the Middle East nation on its own.
“This is going to take a long time,” the first-term Republican senator said. “We’ve been there 15 years. We have a long ways to go yet. The United States must remain a partner of choice for Iraq as it develops into a young democracy.”
So until the United States is confident in the capacity and ability of Iraqi security forces to defend their country, a U.S. military presence will remain necessary to protect American interests, the Iraq War veteran told the United States Institute of Peace on Thursday in Washington, D.C.



And in a similar development, Tuesday Brigadier General Frederic Parisot held a press briefing in Baghdad and insisted "the Iraqi Security Forces continue to secure the country in order to prevent the resurgence of " ISIS.

They haven't done a very good job of that.  First, ISIS never left, it lost control of some cities but a terrorist organization doens't traditionally rule.  In terms of its primary goal (terrorism), ISIS has not been defeated and  has continued to terrorize Iraq.

Martin Jay (RT) observes:

After about three years of ISIS controlling almost a third of the country, Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi declared victory in December 2017 against the terrorist group, as well as declaring that the war was over. Analysts though, at the time, warned that many extremists had merely gone underground or had scattered, and would return. These warnings were not taken seriously, but in recent weeks, Western journalists in Iraq are reporting an alarming return to the battlefield, which is going to give Trump a number of sleepless nights, wrangling over a conundrum he alone is unlikely to resolve.
According to the Washington Post, the battle has shifted into a central zone of Iraq with ISIS now adopting more nefarious, if not theatrical, tactics, leaving many civilians saying that the declaration of victory was premature.
Over the past two months, dozens of people, including local government officials, tribal elders, and village chiefs, have been abducted and killed or ransomed by fighters claiming affiliation with the Islamic State,” the paper claimed recently. “Electricity infrastructure and oil pipelines have been blown up. Armed men dressed as security forces and manning fake checkpoints have hijacked trucks and robbed travellers, rendering the main Baghdad-Kirkuk highway unsafe for a period of weeks.
It’s a horrendous account of Iraq today, with ISIS adapting to new surroundings, and according to the Post, using more and more local people to help with their heinous work. The speed also is worrying some.


So the US leaves when?  According to Senator Ernst not for years.  According to Gen Parisot, not until ISIS is defeated.

The US war in Iraq continues.  Back to Parisot in Baghdad Tuesday:



Q:  Hi, sir.  Tara Copp, Military Times.

A few minutes ago you said whatever the price, you'll continue to fight until [ISIS] is defeated.  Could you define for us when will you know that ISIS is defeated?  What signs are you looking for to be able to then withdraw, stop providing the military support for this operation?

GEN. PARISOT:  Well, now we're still engaged in major combat operations.  And I won't -- I can't speculate, on when it's going to end.

We provide, you know, the best military advice for the political level, but basically, you know, as long as there is a military mission, I guess we are going to stay.



He can't speculate on when that's going to end.  He can't even say what signs would demonstrate success.
"This is going to take a long time."  John McCain was savaged in 2008 for such comments.  Today?  They probably won't even be reported or repeated by most.  "We have a long ways to go yet."

Why?

Because we won't allow the Iraqis to have self-rule.  We impose leaders on them.  They are an undeclared colony.  The US government and the Iranian government try to control Iraq.  Do you really think that, if Iraq had self-rule, they would repeatedly choose one person after another to be prime minister -- one person after another who fled Iraq and lived outside the country for decades?

Chickens who fled are suddenly going to make strong leaders?

Of course not, which is why the US keeps installing them.  Bully Boy Bush installed Nouri al-Maliki (based on the CIA profile that found Nouri to be extremely paranoid), in 2010 when Nouri lost re-election Barack Obama gave him a second term via The Erbil Agreement, 2014 is when Barack replaces him with Hayder al-Abadi.  Weak leaders who were chosen because they are weak.

And what do weak men do?  Lash out.  Thug Nouri made clear he was a thug in his first term.  It's been obvious that Hayder is a little thug himself though the western press has largely ignored it until Hayder's attacks on the protester this month.

Tom O'Connor (NEWSWEEK) reports: the US government admitted Thursday to killing at least 1,000 civilians in Iraq and Syria via bombings.  When US war planes are dropping bombs, reminder, that's a war.

And not only has ISIS not been defeated but it still holds territory in Iraq.  Despite Hayder al-Abadi claiming it was defeated -- even as he claimed that -- ISIS still held (and still holds) territory in Iraq.

Hayder al-Abadi wants a second term as prime minister.  The US government wants that too.

Will they get their way?

REUTERS reports:

Iraq's top Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani called for a government to be formed as soon as possible to tackle corruption and poor basic services.
In a Friday sermon delivered by a representative, Al-Sistani also encouraged the incumbent government of Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi to respond urgently to protesters' demands seeking better basic services and jobs.
"The current government must work hard urgently to implement citizens' demands to reduce their suffering and misery," Al-Sistani's representative said in the Shiite holy city of Kerbala.
Anger is mounting at a time when politicians are struggling to form a government after the May 12 election, which was marred by allegations of fraud that prompted a recount.




The elections were in May.  Next week July turns to August.  Still no prime minister-designate.  In 2010, Iraq went eight months before forming a government.  The way it is supposed to work is that elections are followed by the new Parliament meeting days after the ballots are counted and then they nominated a prime minister-designate (who then has 30 days to put together a cabinet or else the Parliament can name someone new).

Nothing is working in Iraq.  A lot of this dysfunction appears to have been designed by the US government.



If you are wondering why members of both parties just passed the largest defense budget since the height of the Iraq War, consider that much of it goes to defense contractors that spent $69 million lobbying Congress in 2017.





The dysfunction has been hugely profitable for many.  Planned dysfunction?



The following community sites updated:









  • Read on ...

    Monday, July 16, 2018

    Brave and Manly Jon Stewart


     



     
    From May 3, 2015, that's "Brave and Manly Jon Stewart."  C.I. noted:


    Cheered on by his friends -- that he never called out when they repeatedly appeared on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart -- Donald Rumsfeld ("That a guy, Jon! Hold her accountable!") and Colin The Blot Powell ("Yeah, if it weren't for Judy Miller there would be no Iraq War!"), Stewart kicks disgraced reporter Judith Miller while declaring, "Thanks good friends.  Today I am finally a man!"   Isaiah archives his comics at The World Today Just Nuts.

    Look, it's that disgusting Jon Stewart.

    He thought he was the king of politics but he was just a hack.  He made nice with Donald Rumsfeld and Colin Powell on his show but went to town on Judith Miller.

    Judith believed the lies about WMD.  What's Colin and Donald's excuse?

    They had none.

    Jon was a hack and a big fake.  I'm glad he's off TV.  The only thing more annoying than Jon Stewart was the freaks he attracted who seemed to think he was God.  Yes, it was a small group of people but the corporate media tried to treat it as though it was the second coming of Richard Pryor.



    Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


    Friday, July 13, 2018.  Burn pits.


    I've never pretended I can't be a real idiot from time to time but even I'm shocked by my stupidity this go round.

    The Iraq War continues.  We stress that daily here.

    And burn pits were awful for the Iraqi people and for US troops (and US contractors).

    Did you see my ignorance above?

    "Were."

    I've thought this was a "were."

    It's not a "were."

    The US is still using burn pits in Iraq.  Still.

    Perry Chiarmonte (FOX NEWS) reports:


    FOX NEWS EXCLUSIVE – Service members overseas for our nation’s military forces continue to be exposed to toxic chemical clouds emanating from burn pits that are still being used near their bases.
    In a series of images obtained exclusively by Fox News, A burn pit near Camp Taji, Iraq is seen spewing thick clouds of black smoke into the air on a near-daily basis. According to one soldier stationed at the base, the pits are set ablaze as many as five times a week. The images were taken on and around June 3.
    “You know what it is once you smell it,” said the U.S. Army soldier, who requested that his name be withheld for fear of reprisal from his superiors. “That thing smokes and smolders. It’s got that acrid trash smell.”
    Thousands of veterans and former contractors have developed cancer, respiratory problems and blood disorders from their exposure to toxins from the flaming pits at U.S. military bases across Iraq and Afghanistan, and many have died. More than 140,000 active service members and retirees have put their names on a Burn Pit Registry created by the Veterans Administration.
    The soldier sent pictures he personally snapped after seeing recent reporting by Fox News on the issue. In that previous report, a top-level environmental officer from the Pentagon recalled how he warned top military officials of the dangers of the burn pit method as early as 2005 during the height of the war in Iraq.
    “The burning is still going on,” the service member said to Fox News. “It’s all around us. I don’t want to go 15 years down the road and wind up sick.”
    Like the Iraq War, the burn pits continue.


    And the burn pits remain in use in Iraq.

    “There’s no guessing at what we will experience down the road from all the pollution and toxins created in this smoke.” Burn pits near US military bases in Iraq keep smoldering, as the health debate rages.


    Burn pits near US military bases in Iraq keep smoldering, as health debate rages





    Again, I can be a real idiot and I was this time because I thought this was done.  I'm not the only one who thought that way.


    We have to get my bipartisan bill to help our heroes who have been exposed to toxic burn pits across the finish line. (It recently passed the Senate.) Our veterans are counting on us.


    Exposure to burn pits can produce serious & potentially life-threatening health effects on our troops. It’s time to take action. Congress must make passing the Burn Pits Accountability Act a priority to ensure proper care and services for veterans.





    Senator Klobuchar thought this was an issue that was in the past and our efforts now needed to focus on fixing what had taken place.

    I want to say that 2006 was the first hearing I attended about the burn pits.

    That's 12 years ago.

    And despite all the testimony to members of Congress, the US is still using burn pits in Iraq?

    This is outrageous.



    L. Russell Keith explained to the Democratic Policy Committee on  November 6, 2009,  "While I was stationed at Balad, I experienced the effects of the massive burn pit that burned 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The ten-acre pit was located in the northwest corner of the base. An acrid, dark black smoke from the pit would accumulate and hang low over the base for weeks at a time. Every spot on the base was touched by smoke from the pit; everyone who served at the base was exposed to the smoke. It was almost impossible to escape, even in our living units.".

    Then-Senator Byron Dorgan presided over the hearing.  Questioning Keith, Dorgan established that these burn pits would never be allowed to operate in the US due to the damages the pits cause to health -- they'd face fines and jail, agreed Keith, if they tried to get away with operating these same burn pits in the US.


    And there were regulartions -- even in Iraq and Afghanistan -- that were supposed to be followed but weren't which prompted the release of the US Government Accountability Office's 2010 report [PDF format warning] entitled "AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ: DOD Should Improve Adherence to Its Guidance on Open Pit Burning and Solid Waste Management."


    June 13th, 2012 then-US Senator Mark Udall explained burn pits while speaking to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee:


    In both Afghanistan and Iraq, open air burn pits were widely used at forward operating bases.  Disposing of trash and other debris was a major challenge.  Commanders had to find a way to dispose of waste while concentrating on the important mission at hand.  The solution that was chosen, however, had serious risks.  Pits of waste were set on fire -- sometimes using jet fuel for ignition.  Some burn pits were small but others covered multiple acres of land. Often times, these burn pits would turn the sky black.  At Joint Base Balad Iraq, over 10 acres of land were used for burning toxic debris.  At the height of its operations, Balad hosted approximately 25,000 military, civilian and coalition provision authority personnel.  These personnel would be exposed to a toxic soup of chemicals released into the atmosphere.  According to air quality measurements, the air at Balad had multiple particulates harmful to humans: Plastics and Styrofoams, metals, chemicals from paints and solvents, petroleum and lubricants, jet fuel and unexploded ordnance, medical and other dangerous wastes.  The air samples at Joint Base Balad turned up some nasty stuff. Particulate matter, chemicals that form from the incomplete burning of coal, oil and gas garbage or other organic substances, volatile organic compounds such as acetone and benzene  -- benzene, as you all know, is known to cause leukemia --  and dioxins which are associated with Agent Orange.  According to the American Lung Association, emissions from burning waste contain fine particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, volatile organic compounds and various irritant gases such as nitrogen oxides that can scar the lungs. All of this was in the air and being inhaled into the lungs of service members. 


    KBR faqcilitated a lot of the burn pits.  And KBR knew they weren't following the guidelines. Former US Senator Blanche Lincoln pointed out, while serving in the Senate, that KBR would make additional money from cleaning the sites -- they would get paid for fixing their own mess -- even though they themselves wouldn't do the work -- they'd subcontract it out.

    This was about greed -- KBR refused to even move the burn pits downwind when the damages were being discussed openly in the press -- and it was about people.  People have died due to these burnpits.



    Staff Sgt. Steven Gregory Ochs and Staff Sgt. Matt Bumpus are two early examples of people who died who never even should have gotten ill.  They were betrayed by greed and by their own government.   October 8, 2009,  Steven Gregory Ochs' sister Stacy Pennington testified to the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee on behalf of her brother and her family and on behalf of Bumpus and his family.



    Stacy Pennington: Both of these brave soldiers you see before you dodged bullets, mortar attacks, roadside bombs and suicide bombers. Eventually their tours of duty would take their lives. The ultimate sacrifice for a soldier, for his country, is death. However, their deaths did not show up in the manner you may assume. In Balad is the site of the infamous enormous burn pit that has been called by Lt Col Darrin L. Curtis, USAF and Bio-environmental Engineering Flight Commander, as "the worst environmental site" he had ever visited. Staff Sgt Ochs and Staf Sgt Bumpus were both stationed in Balad and war, as strategic as it is, followed them home. Death lay dormant in their blood and waited for them to return safely home and into the arms of their loved ones. Like every silent ticking bomb, it eventually exploded. On September 28, 2007, just months after Steve's return home from his third tour, he was diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, also known as AML. He spent the next ten months as a patient -- more like a resident -- at Duke University Hospital. Doctors at Duke said his aggressive form of AML was definitely chemically induced and, like Steve, both agreed it was due to the exposures he experienced while in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, the doctors refused to go on record citing as the reason that they could not prove it. The aggressive AML that Steve endured was similar to bullets ricocheting in the body causing torturous pain. The graphic images embedded in my mind are of Steve's last screams for air as he was rushed into ICU. Steve waved goodbye to my husband. Steve, with very little strength, said, "I love you, sis" and my mom kissed his forehead and said, "We will see you when you get comfortable." Five minutes later, while in the ICU waiting room, the nurse came in to tell us Steve went into cardiac arrest and they were working on him now. My mom ran into ICU -- fell to her knees as she realized her son was dying. Screams filled the air as we begged God to keep Steve here with us. We know Steve heard us as tears were in Steve's eyes. Doctors and nurses pumped on Steve's chest trying to revive him. But I knew immediately he was gone. His spirit that surrounded my dear, sweet brother was gone. We were left alone with Steve's body for hours as we were all in pure shock. My mom looked upon my brother's face and wiped away the tears puddled in his eyes. And at that very moment, our lives were changed forever. Steve died on July 12, 2008. Two weeks later, on the opposite of the coast, Staff Sgt Bumpus would succumb to the same fate. For Staff Sgt Matt Bumpus, the ticking time bomb exploded with a vengeance on July 31, 2006. Matt was rushed to the hospital by ambulance with acute appendicitis. In Matt's own words, I quote, "The next thing I remember is hearing that I had been diagnosed with AML." Doctors declared that there was chromosome damage due to exposures he must have come in contact with while in Iraq. Matt ended his prestigious service to the Army one short year before the war zone chemical warfare showed signs of its presence. As if this was not enough suffering, Staff Sgt Bumpus' family was met by the VA with harsh claims of denial to benefits. This battle continues to this day as Lisa, Staff Sgt Bumpus' wife, is left alone with two small children to raise with no VA or military benefits for her family. The aggressive assault of the AML in Matt's body was taking claim. Jo, Matt's mother, recalls the haunted look in Matt's eyes as he revealed to her that the AML invasion was back. Matt's mother will never forget the discouragement and sadness that overwhelmed Matt as the realization that promises he made to his wife and children to provide for his family, to love and protect them, and that his sacred word would be broken. He knew now that the battle was over and he would be leaving his family behind. Tuesday, July 29, 2008, Matt once again entered the hospital with fever and septic infection that discharged throughout his body. Doctors notified the family that it would just be days before his demise. Matt was heavily sedated as the pain and incubation was unbearable. Nate, Matt's ten-year-old son, bravely entered his father's hospital room to lay on his daddy's chest as he said his final goodbye. Nate curled up by his dad and cried and cried. Despite Matt's heavy sedation, Matt too was crying. Matt, being a devoted Christian, appropriately passed away on a Sunday morning, surrounded by his wife, mother, father and sister as they expressed to Matt their everlasting love. They, too, were in shock and stayed with Matt's body as the realization overwhelmed them that Matt would not be going home. Matt died on August 3, 2008.


    Again, this was an outrage and it remains one today.  The burn pits are still being utilized.








    The US government is failing yet again.

    But we should point out that the Iraqi government is also failing.  They have a responsibility to protect the Iraqi people.

    Birth defects are on the rise in Iraq.  And burn pits is not a new or unknown topic.

    Why has the Iraqi government looked the other way and allowed the US to utilize burn pits in Iraq?  Why are they not protecting the Iraqi people?


    It's no wonder the Iraqi people are protesting.




    Following anti-corruption protests across southern , protesters in Najaf storm the governor’s office and airport, chanting “the people want the fall of the [political] parties”















    The following community sites -- plus Jody Watley -- updated:














    Read on ...
    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.