Tina Turner? I was a fan of her music. Not old enough to be a fan of the music before the 80s. But I can remember hearing "Let's Stay Together" and being seriously impressed. It's not like Al Greene's version was so-so. But Tina took the song he made famous and turned it into something else entirely.
And it was hit after hit. She was the Queen of Rock and Roll. She sold tickets to live performances, she sold albums. Everyone knew who she was.
1989's "The Best" or 1993's "I Don't Want To Fight" would be my favorite music video she did.
10 favorite tracks off the top of my head? I think I need to do 20 (in addition to the two above).
1) "I Might Have Been Queen"
2) "What's Love Got To Do With It"
3) "Steamy Windows"
4) "Private Dancer"
5) "One of the Living"
6) "It's Only Love" (duet with Bryan Adams)
7) "Golden Eye"
8) "Better Be Good To Me"
9) "Steel Claw"
10) "Help"
11) "Johnny & Mary"
12) "A Change Is Going To Come" (live with Robert Cray)
13) "What You See Is What You Get"
14) "On Silent Wings" (duet with Sting)
15) "Break Every Rule"
16) "When The Heartache Is Over"
17) "Tonight" (duet with David Bowie)
18) "In Your Wildest Dreams" (duet with Barry White)
19) "I'll Be Thunder"
20) "Total Control" (off the WE ARE THE WORLD album)
In the opening weeks of the 2023 legislative season alone, more than 400 pieces of legislation aimed at LGBTQ people— most of them targeting schools — were introduced throughout the country.
It’s no surprise that queer students in Republican-dominated states where
these laws have passed are profoundly impacted. But less visible is the
dramatic effect the steady drumbeat of headlines has had on youth in
places with even strong anti-discrimination laws. Newly released data
from the advocacy groups GLSEN and The Trevor Project show increases in
hostility, victimization and discrimination experienced by students in
blue states as well as red.
The effects are devastating. Nearly half of LGBTQ 13- to 17-year-olds considered suicide last year, as opposed to some 19% of
high school students overall, according to The Trevor Project. Eighteen
percent actually attempted it. Seventy percent report anxiety, and 57%
experienced depression.
Strong
in-school relationships are a well-known protective factor. LGBTQ
students who say their teachers care a lot about them are 37% less likely to consider suicide and 43% less likely to be depressed than those who don’t feel cared for, according to The Trevor Project.
Rates
of self-harm are much lower among students who feel affirmed in school,
and acceptance of LGBTQ students had risen steadily — if unevenly —
following legal recognition of same-sex marriage. But the number of
youth who see their schools as affirming has fallen dramatically over
the last four years.
In California — where the first gay couples married in 2008 and schools began teaching LGBTQ history a decade ago — a statewide survey of students found that the number who reported hearing homophobic remarks from adults in school rose from 12% in 2019 to 49% in 2021. That’s an increase of 408%.
In Massachusetts,
where same-sex marriage has been recognized for almost 20 years, the
number of youth exposed to anti-LGBT remarks is up 686% over the same
time frame.
Yeah,
but, hate merchants, keep pretending that your concern is for the
kids. Scarface Tulsi Gabbard might try having kids -- before it's too
late, she's 42 -- since she's so obsessed with other people's children. Or is
Tulsi too manly for pregnancy? The report notes:
A new data analysis by The 74 shows how this political wedge issue, aimed at a relatively small population of students,
is having an outsize effect. The number of youth who identify as
something other than cisgender is growing, but it’s still a tiny number
of children.
Of
the approximately 16 million high school students in the United States,
an estimated 1.8 million, or 11.6%, identify as LGBTQ. Just 300,000 are
gender-nonconforming.
Ten years after same-sex marriage became widely recognized, a sizeable majority of Americans are comfortable with
gay, lesbian and bisexual co-workers and neighbors. Experts say it’s
harder to attempt to undo LGBT rights overall than to capitalize on confusion about the experiences of a very small subset of people.
And
unlike past campaigns to vilify LGBTQ people, this time, the rhetoric
targets kids, not adults. Even though some of the new policies take aim
at bathrooms and gymnasiums, the impact spills over to classrooms,
hallways and libraries, affecting a much larger number of children.
They
are bullied and assaulted; subjected to increasingly negative remarks
even from teachers who are supposed to protect them; silenced from
raising LGBTQ topics — even talking about their families during class
discussions; discouraged from participating in sports or other activities; forbidden from wearing clothing with
supportive messages or forming gay-straight alliances or other
affirming student clubs; disciplined for identifying as LGBTQ and for
wearing clothes deemed “inappropriate” for their gender.
It's
like the 70s all over again. As I've noted before, not long ago, a group of
gay adult malea at one group we were speaking to in the last 12 months, brought up what life was
really like for them in high school and middle school. Teachers and
principals mocked them and made fun of them, publicly ridiculed them.
My response was sue. I don't care if it gets kicked out for whatever
reason. Get on the record so that these failures do not get to enjoy
their retirement but instead everyone grasps that these failures weren't
just intolerant, they were actively betraying their legal
obligations.
I would
recommend the same to the families of any children currently in school
and experiencing this. File immediately. Let's identify these people
who think they can abuse their jobs and harass students.
That's the only way this will stop.
The American Taliban is brave when egged on by a bunch of hate merchants but when they find out
it's not Tulsi Gabbard that's having to pay for the actions, but
themselves, they'll learn to conduct themselves as educators are
supposed to.
Rowan Johnson learned what it meant to be transgender not from a parent or a teacher, but from Jerry Springer.
Home
from school one day when they were about 8 years old, Johnson caught
Springer’s often-raucous daytime talk show. “There are girls here to
tell their parents they want to be boys,” Johnson recalls hearing at the
top of the hour.
That’s something a person can do? Johnson
thought. They had sensed already that something was different about
their own gender identity but didn’t know what. “I didn’t have the words
for ‘transgender’ or ‘nonbinary’ or any of this.”
Most
trans adults went to school at a time when there was little or no
discussion of gender identity. If the subject came up, it was on tabloid
television or in schoolyard taunts rather than in conversation with
caring adults. Now, as Americans debate policies that affect trans
Americans, there’s disagreement over how — or whether — to broach these
issues in schools.
For transgender children, this question can be urgent. A Washington Post-KFF poll conducted
in late 2022 found that about 1 in 3 transgender adults was 10 years
old or younger when they began to understand that their gender was
different from their sex assigned at birth. Forty-five percent of them
said they felt unsafe at school, the place where they spent most of
their time and where acceptance or rejection can make a deep impression.
The isolation and discrimination that many trans people experience can
lead to depression, substance abuse, self harm and suicide, experts say.
[. . .]
In
other words, what trans Americans say is needed appears at odds with
what many Americans appear comfortable providing. That’s unsettling to
the trans community at a time when gender identity has taken center
stage in the culture wars and Republican lawmakers have attacked the
very existence of trans people.
“If
I had had the opportunity," said Johnson, "to learn that it’s normal
and common to question your gender identity and to want to experiment
and explore your gender identity, I think it would have saved a lot of
emotional pain.”
The
poll found support for teaching these issues in high school, with more
than 6 in 10 saying it was appropriate. Americans were divided when
asked about middle school. But at the same time, nearly 7 in 10
Americans supported laws that would bar discrimination against trans
people in K-12 schools.
The
American Taliban is in the minority -- just as they are on abortion.
But what the people want doesn't matter to these authoritarians. They
want to destroy the country and destroy democracy. The right to privacy
got shredded in DOBBS and they planned and conspired for years to get
to that point. They're coming after every right and you're insane -- or
married to Max Blumenthal (which may be the same thing) -- if you can't
see that.
Target
on Wednesday said it was removing some products that celebrate Pride
Month after the company and its employes became the focus of a
“volatile” anti-LGBTQ campaign.
The
company said threats against employees impacted their sense of safety
and well-being, but Target did not specify which products it was
removing, the nature of the threats, or where they occurred. Target said
it removed from shelves “items that have been at the center of the most
significant confrontational behavior.”
For
a decade, Target has celebrated Pride Month in and around June. The
company runs advertisements to appeal to LGBTQ customers and employees,
and it sells t-shirts, coffee mugs and merchandise with rainbow flags
and other symbols of gay rights.
“Pride Month at Target is a time of affirmation and solidarity with the LGBTQIA+ community,” the company says on its website.
A
few things. Openly homophobic people? They can't afford Target and
don't shop there regularly. Threats against employees? Those need to be reported
to legal authorities and done so immediately. Isn't it interesting
that Jonathan Turley is no where to be found yet again.
He's
like FOX "NEWS" -- emphasizing everything that will scare the elderly
but nothing that will enlighten or educate. He's an old whore slinging
it for FOX "NEWS."
The
backward and inbred homophobes who study online with Professor Turley pretend to
care about democracy. But it's not really a democracy, is it, if you're
threatening violence because you don't want people to have the option
of buying clothing? That's reality and it's not an angle Turley is
going to share with his cult or, for that matter, that FOX "NEWS" plans
to share. Target clearly noted threats of violence to the staff. But here's FOX BUSINESS "NEWS" 'covering' the topic and leaving that threat out. CNN could -- and did -- note the threats. USA TODAY did as well. AP did as well. BLOOMBERG NEWS did it.
But not FOX "NEWS." This is how FOX "NEWS" lies -- they don't
present most stories and when they do present a story they lie and they
leave out significant details. A half-wit could park themselves in
front of the TV, watch six hours straight of FOX "NEWS" and still be a
half-wit when they turned the TV off.
A
right-wing outlet (tiny and we're not promoting it) wants you to know
that conservatives are "successfully" boycotting Target. Homophobic
conservatives
don't shop there. Try the Dollar General. This is the same crowd --
small and vocal -- that Nancy Reagan sneered at (they were focused on
ending abortion when she was First Lady) and this crowd buys beers
and Fritos but, as demographics make very clear, they don't have the
income to spend at Target. Walmart is a big treat for them. So, no,
they're not "successfully" boycotting a store that they don't actually
shop at. If they did shop there, they would have noticed, years ago,
that Target celebrates Pride every June. Bad news for them, Walmart did
last year too. May have done so before last year but last year Walmart
even offered a Pride ice cream. For this crowd, Dollar
General and Dollar Tree and Dollar whatever are their go-tos. Again,
that's demographics. This is the group that loved FOX "NEWS" but
couldn't find it in their budget to pay for the streamer FOX NEWS
NATION.
This
is a war on freedom carried out by the American Taliban. They are not
patriotic and they do not believe in democracy. They're for tyranny and
oppression.
California
Governor Gavin Newsom called out the war on the LBGTQ+ and hate
merchant Marjorie Taylor thought her response was called for.
Good for Gavin. As for Marjorie? Yes, she is the space laser person. Let's again note Chelsea Handler on
MTG.
Marjorie
Taylor Greene: I have people come up to me and say crazy things to me
out of the blue in public places that they believe because they read it
on the internet.
Chelsea
Handler: Well if that's not the pot calling the kettle QAnon. This
woman thought 9/11 was a hoax, that the Clintons killed JFK Jr. and that
Jews are in charge of space lasers. But please, don't come at her with
some crazy ideas -- she might believe them.
Crazy Marjorie will continue attempting to destroy this country. Paul Rudnick noted Crazy Marjorie this week.
This is not about helping the kids. It's not helping children, first of all, but that's just their cover story.
Amid recent, highly publicized conservative backlash to several
corporations partnering with LGBTQ+ artists and activists, two far-right
commentators are saying the quiet part loud: Their goal is to make
support for the LGBTQ+ community “toxic” to brands.
On Wednesday, Matt Walsh, a host for far-right media outlet The Daily Wire
and one of the most virulently anti-trans voices in the country, kicked
off a tweet storm about recent calls to boycott brands like Bud Light
and Target by explicitly outlining what he says has been the goal from
the start.
“The goal is to make ‘pride’ toxic for brands,” Walsh tweeted. “If they
decide to shove this garbage in our face, they should now that they’ll
pay a price. It won’t be worth whatever they think they’ll gain. First
Bud Light and now Target. Our campaign is making progress. Let’s keep
going.”
On his own Daily Wire show, host Michael Knowles
reiterated Walsh’s point. “This has been the point that has been
building for months now, which is we need to make that symbol toxic, the
Pride flag symbol, we need to make that toxic,” Knowles said. “We need
to have companies think twice about it.”
“Everyone was talking about the Dylan Mulvaney incident as being
harmful to the Bud Light brand,” he continued. “That’s true. But more
importantly, it was harmful to the Dylan Mulvaney brand. Now, other
companies are going to think twice before sponsoring Dylan Mulvaney
because they don’t want to lose $6 billion in market cap in two days.
That’s what we got to do. And then once we make these things culturally
toxic or as we’re making these symbols culturally toxic, we’ve got to
bring in the cavalry, we’ve got to come back in with more political
force to ban some of this stuff and to say no.”
The Bud Light debacle started in early April, when the beer brand partnered with Mulvaney,
a trans influencer and popular target for anti-trans trolls, sending
her a one-off commemorative beer can with an image of her face on it.
Transphobes both online and in the media quickly called for a boycott of
parent company Anheuser-Busch’s products. The corporation’s lackluster
response to the backlash drew criticism from the LGBTQ+ community and
led the Human Rights Campaign to downgrade Anheuser-Busch’s previous 100 percent rating on the organization’s corporate equality index.
On Wednesday, Walsh also tweeted that, “The Bud Light boycott will
prove to be one of the most significant conservative victories of this
decade. It was never just about Bud Light. It was about sending a
message.”
This is a war declared by the American Taliban.
Acceptance
of gays and lesbians has increased and most Americans grasp that. So
these hate merchants seized upon the "T" and worked overtime to lie and
scare the easily frightened over transgender persons and pretend that
there are all these five-year-olds having gender surgery.
They lied -- and they were helped by THE NEW YORK TIMES and other outlets -- and they've scared a country.
And
on the left we get idiots like Max Blumenthal's wife offering smears on
transgendered person because the left doesn't want to her February
event which was putting a convicted pedophile on stage. Grasp that Mrs.
Blumenthal can't defend transgender people (and has a pinned Tweet
attacking them at the top of her feed since February) but she will
gladly share the stage with a convicted pedophile who was sent to
prison.
And, of course, Marjorie had the
pro-pedophile working for her. These anti-Trans people are the ones
hanging around with child molestors.
This war
is doing great harm. Applause for Gavin and everyone who is standing
up right now. Shame on those -- especially if you claim to be left --
who are silent or, even worse, encouraging this war. Daniel Villareal (LGBTQ NATION) reports:
A cisgender mother helping her cis disabled son use the restroom was
prevented from entering a Kansas library’s women’s restroom with him,
even though they’ve done that for years. The mother thinks that the
state’s recently passed anti-transgender bathroom bill is to blame, but
the library has called the incident “a mishandled customer service
moment.”
On May 20, Karen Wild entered a women’s bathroom in the
Wichita Public Library’s central branch with her son, Ellis Dunville.
She was assisting her son, who is on the autism spectrum, has a seizure
disorder, and is nonverbal, The Topeka Capital-Journal reported.
A male security guard told her that her son couldn’t enter the restroom.
Wild said they had used the women’s restroom together for years without
any issues. However, she also noted that another person in the women’s
restroom objected to her son’s presence.
Shortly after, a female library employee entered, said the library
had policies regulating restroom use, and asked Wild if she and her son
could use the building’s gender-neutral family restroom, which Wild
never knew existed.
Wild told the aforementioned publication that she suspected the incident might have occurred because the legislature recently passed S.B. 180, a law that bans trans people from using bathrooms and other facilities matching their gender identity.
“There isn’t anything I can think of that has changed except that
they heard about that law and decided they needed to be emboldened by it
somehow,” she said. “I can’t explain it any other way.”
Sophie, who gained the title of Duchess of Edinburgh when her husband Prince Edward took on a new role in March
after the death of Queen Elizabeth II, has said in the past that she is
passionate about supporting women and gender equality around the world.
Really not sure what to say here. First, Sophie's visit brings attention to Iraq and that is a good thing.
But there's more than just that.
Why are we supposed to be enthused? The current king of England visited Basra in 2009.
More
the point, England destroyed Iraq as much as the United States did.
Are we ignoring that as we rush to celebrate a ruling class figure
visiting the country they destroyed?
+ As most readers of Roaming Charges know, I’ve been skeptical of
Seymour Hersh’s reporting on the sabotage of the Nordstream pipelines.
Some of his initial assertions were easily disproved and others seemed
highly speculative and thinly, very thinly, sourced. Hersh’s narrative
was problematic and antiquated. One of the most glaring issues to me
was: why use scuba divers, like something out of a 70s Bond movie, which
require decompression tanks and conspicuous naval support, when you
could deploy the weapon de jour: underwater drones controlled by a
joystick and a laptop? Now comes James Bamford, an intelligence reporter
whose credentials are at least as accomplished as Hersh’s (and somewhat
less tarnished), with a detailed and persuasive account in The Nation
that explains how it’s much more likely that Ukrainian intelligence
operatives, trained in underwater demolition techniques by the Brits and
the US, blew up the pipelines using submersible drones, with the
probable assistance of Poland. Where Hersh is vague, Bamford is
specific. Where Hersh relies on a sole anonymous source, Bamford
meticulously builds his piece from documents. Bamford explains in
compelling detail how it was done, the kind of drones used and why both
Ukraine and Poland wanted to take the pipelines out. Bamford also
suggests that both Russian and US intelligence knew that a plot in was
the works and that the US kept quiet because the sabotage had been
committed by its allies. This is deeply informed journalism and also a
terrific read.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.