Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kamala Harris. Show all posts

Saturday, July 30, 2022

Baby Stacey Wants On The Ticket

baby stacey


From May 25, 2020, that's "Baby Stacey Wants On The Ticket."  C.I. noted:

Isaiah's latest THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Baby Stacey Wants On The Ticket."  Stacey Abrams of so very few accomplishments insists, "Joe should pick me because I would bring youth to the ticket."  Senator Kamala Harris dryly responds, "Yeah.  Youth."  Isaiah archives his comics at THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS. 


That comic stood the test, Stacey still hasn't accomplished anything.

Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Friday, July 29, 2022.  The motto for the Biden era: Its the incompetency, stupid.


The r-word.  BREAKING POINTS wonders if we're seeing the recession confirmed before our eyes.



THE HILL wonders if US President Joe Biden will admit the recession is here?


I wonder who will be the modern day James Carville and stress, "It's the incompetence, stupid?"


Nick Beams (WSWS) reports:


The US economy has taken another significant step towards recession with economic output contracting for the second quarter in a row, a situation often referred to as a “technical recession.”

When the first quarter results were released, they were generally passed off as having no real significance, the result of a statistical aberration. But the latest data indicate they were the start of a trend.

The official definition of a recession in the US is determined by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) and it will not make a determination for some time. But whatever it decides, the data for the last two quarters indicate a significant slowdown over the past six months. In the December quarter of 2021, the US economy was growing at an annualised rate of 6.9 percent.

Breaking down the data, there were a number of results which point to the underlying trends. Consumer spending, which accounts for around two thirds of total economic output, grew by only 1 percent for the quarter, down from the 1.8 percent increase in the first. Consumer spending growth is now at its lowest rate since the start of the pandemic.

Real wages are falling, with real disposable income falling by 0.5 percent for the quarter, the fifth straight quarterly fall.

The biggest drag on growth was the drop in business inventories which cut 2 percent off the headline result. Earlier Walmart, America’s biggest retailer, reported that it was cutting prices in a bid to clear out inventories that had built up because of falling demand. Business investment was also down.

There is a concerted attempt to deny that recession is taking hold. Earlier this week US treasury secretary Janet Yellen said the US economy was not in recession and she would “be amazed” if the NBER declared it was.


Tuesday, Trina observed:


Yesterday, CNBC reported:

Walmart cut its quarterly and full-year profit estimates because of rising food inflation. This alarmed investors who deliberated the implications for other retail stocks. The big-box retailer said higher prices are spurring consumers to pull back on general merchandise spending, particularly in apparel.

Walmart plunged 7.6% Tuesday and dragged other retailers with it. Kohl’s and Target dropped 9.1% and 3.6%, respectively. Among apparel companies, Macy’s was among the hardest hit, down 7.2%. Nordstrom and Ross each lost more than 5%, and TJX Companies shed about 4.2%. The SPDR S&P Retail ETF fell nearly 4.2%.


Inflation's destroying everything.  We don't need war with Russia.  We never did.  And we've never needed to throw all of our money away by giving it to Ukraine.  But that's what Joe Biden's done and he's destroyed our economy.

DNYUZ reports:

A day after Walmart warned investors that its profit would shrink as rising prices forced shoppers to make fewer purchases at its stores, Unilever, Coca-Cola and McDonald’s, three other consumer-facing giants, reinforced the message, to different degrees, providing a window into how companies are navigating this fragile economic moment.

On Tuesday, Unilever, the maker of Dove soap, Ben & Jerry’s ice cream and Hellmann’s mayonnaise, said it raised prices until they were 11 percent higher than in the same quarter last year, offsetting a 2 percent decline in the volume of things that consumers bought. It was the fourth consecutive quarter in which prices outpaced volume growth at the company.


It's the incompetency, stupid.

Evan Blake (WSWS) points out:

The infection of US President Joe Biden with COVID-19 marks a significant turning point in the US response to the pandemic. This event, which should have provoked deep concern and self-reflection by the Biden administration, was instead utilized to openly state the White House’s brutal new policy towards the pandemic: Everyone will get infected with COVID-19, repeatedly, year after year, forever.

As the World Socialist Web Site has noted, last winter’s surge of the highly infectious and immune-resistant Omicron BA.1 subvariant prompted the scrapping of all mitigation measures to slow the spread of COVID-19. As with previous variants, officials from numerous world governments made unscientific claims that BA.1 would induce lasting immunity and send the virus into “endemicity.”

Now, after successive waves of three more Omicron subvariants, this threadbare lie is being discarded and the Biden administration is openly pursuing a policy of perpetual mass infection. This is essentially a repackaged and even more dangerous version of the “herd immunity” strategy implemented by Donald Trump, as it threatens to rapidly erode the efficacy of existing vaccines and treatments. While openly stating their intention to allow SARS-CoV-2 to spread uncontrolled in perpetuity, the White House continues to cover up the horrific implications this will have for American and world society.

It is evident that sometime in June the decision was made to substantially reduce the safety precautions in place to protect the President from contracting COVID-19. In recent weeks, numerous photos and videos were staged at large indoor events and meetings internationally with a maskless Biden. In effect, the White House consciously allowed Biden to be infected as part of a deepening propaganda campaign to force American society to accept their policy of “forever COVID.”

On July 18, three days before Biden’s infection was made public, his 81-year-old Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci told Politico, “We’re in a pattern now. If somebody says, ‘You’ll leave when we don’t have COVID anymore,’ then I will be 105. I think we’re going to be living with this.” In other words, Dr. Fauci stated that the pandemic will drag on for at least the next quarter century.

At each of the three press conferences held during Biden’s illness, White House COVID Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha and Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre reiterated this statement of surrender to the virus, while stating that all Americans will inevitably be infected with COVID-19.

On July 21, Jean-Pierre stated, “Look, we knew this was going to happen. As Dr. Jha said … at some point, everyone is going to get COVID.” The following day, Dr. Jha said bluntly, “This virus is going to be with us forever.” On Monday, July 25, Jean-Pierre repeated, “As we have said, almost everyone is going to get COVID.” Numerous articles in the bourgeois press and segments on the broadcast news outlets parroted these same talking points.

Finally, on Wednesday Biden tested negative for COVID-19 and ended his isolation. Visibly unwell, coughing repeatedly, his voice still deep from the infection, and stumbling over his words more than usual, Biden gave a lying and cynical 10-minute speech to a group of maskless, cheering staffers in the Rose Garden, in which he portrayed vaccines and Pfizer’s antiviral Paxlovid as magical “tools” that nullify the dangers of perpetual mass viral transmission.

In the course of his speech, Biden referred to God three times and “prayers” once. He made no reference to the rising daily death toll from COVID-19, the impacts of Long COVID, viral evolution, mask mandates, airborne transmission, or other critical concerns about the pandemic raised by leading scientists. On the same day as Biden’s speech, 801 Americans officially died from COVID-19 and the seven-day average of daily new deaths rose to 440, up 67 percent from the trough reached on June 21, while hospitalizations approached 44,000, a three-fold increase in the past three months.

In 1992, James Carville boiled down Bill Clinton's campaign to three main points with the chief one being the economy and stressing to staffers on a daily basis, "It's the economy, stupid."

That's what they were focusing on because that's what the American people were focusing on.


These days?  Someone needs to look Joe in the eye and tell him, "It's the incompetency, stupid."


Because the Biden presidency has been all about incompetency.


COVID 19?  It did not arrive on his tenure.  It was already here and he has no plans to this day for it.  The pandemic was already going when he ran for president and made promises.  Now he's president and he's not doing a damn thing.  We'll all get it?  How lucky we are to have you in office.


He's an incompetent fool.


Our economy was suffering.  But he made it much worse with his billions given to Ukraine while Americans at home suffered.  He was the 'great guy' buying dinner for everyone while at home the electricity was getting turned off because we hadn't paid the bills.  


Ukraine is not the 51st in the US.  


But Joe wanted war on Russia.  And that war is destroying the global economy.


It's the incompetency, stupid.


He is a failure in every regard and if, in year two of his presidency, the best 'solution' he can offer with regards to the pandemic is that we're all going to get COVID, he needs to resign because he has nothing to offer.

Under his watch, ROE V WADE was overturned.  Precedent has been trashed and Clarence Thomas has made clear that when not eyein' his porn, he's busy planning to overturn birth control access, marriage equality and nearly any other privacy right he can get his spare hand on.  By the way, is it karma that a sex perv like him ended up married to such an unattractive woman?


Joe does nothing.  He doesn't publicly demand Congress codify ROE into law.  He wobbles along, eager to get his photo taken and he does nothing.  


The country needs a leader and Joe's AWOL.


Kenny Stancil (COMMON DREAMS) reports:

Liberal comedian Jon Stewart chastised the GOP on Thursday, less than 24 hours after Senate Republicans tanked a bill that would have expanded healthcare access for U.S. military veterans exposed to Agent Orange and toxic burn pits—a move that was made in retaliation for Democrats reviving their reconciliation package following the passage of bipartisan legislation designed to boost domestic semiconductor chip manufacturing.

"Everyone needs to watch this," progressive commentator Krystal Ball tweeted, sharing a clip of Stewart, who has lobbied for improved assistance for veterans harmed by toxins, speaking in Washington, D.C. "Republicans are literally blocking care for veterans poisoned by burn pits as part of their temper tantrum over a deal to tax corporations and create clean energy jobs."

Speaking at a Capitol Hill press conference held in the wake of the GOP's refusal to advance the Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act, Stewart told the crowd: "I'm used to the hypocrisy... I'm used to the lies... I'm used to the cowardice... I'm used to all of it, but I am not used to the cruelty."

"These motherf[**]kers," said Stewart, referring to U.S. senators, "don't support the troops, [they] support the war machine."

"They haven't met a war they won't sign up for, and they haven't met a veteran they won't screw over," added the former host of The Daily Show, who now has a program on Apple TV+.


Good for Jon for his righteous rage.  But it's not a surprise.  


Joe could have ensured the legislation passed.  He could have tied it around the Republicans neck ahead of the vote.  He could have made it an issue.  He didn't.


And the press really won't either.  When, years ago, 'Democrat' Jim Webb tanked a bill to expand veterans benefits with regards to Agent Orange, I was as outraged as Jon is now.  And then the head of a veterans group told me that if I wanted to get mad wait and get mad at all the people who rush to hush it up.  He was right.


Veterans knew what Webb did.  It's why he didn't run for re-election.  He didn't have enough support anymore to win.  But the media played it off and never raised that issue when he announced he was retiring and no one ever called him for being the piece of crap that he was.


We didn't cover for him.  Late to the party?  February 14, 2012:


First, if you need to know how ugly the Agent Orange issue got on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, you can refer to the September 23, 2010 snapshot reporting on that day's hearing when Senator Jim Webb had his little hissy, when Senator Roland Burris insisted that "budget shortfalls" do not mean you cut needed health benefits for veterans and, as Senator Burris said that, Senator Jon Testor, with an angry look on his face, rose and stormed out of the hearing.  Earlier Testor had been backing up Webb who was furious that VA Secretary Eric Shinseki was attempting to see to it that the victims of Agent Orange got the help they needed.
 
And we're going to drop back to the June 15, 2010 snapshot:
 
 WAVY reports (link has text and video) that victims of Agent Orange (specifically Vietnam era veterans) could recieve addition beneifts for B-Cell Leukemia, Parkinson's disease and coronary heart disease.  Could?  A US Senator is objecting to the proposed changes by VA.  Jim Webb has written VA Secretary Eric Shinseki that ". . . this single executive decision is estimated to cost a minimum of $42.2 billion over the next ten years. A regulatory action of this magnitude requires proper Congressional review and oversight."  Besides, Webb wrote, "Heart disease is a common phenomenon regardless of potential exposure to Agent Orange." That is really embarrasing and especially embarrassing for the Democratic Party (Webb is a Democrat today, having converted from a Reagan Republican).  It also goes a long way towards explaining Webb's refusal to get on board with Senator Evan Bayh's bill to create a national registry that would allow those Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans to be able to receive treatment for their exposures without having to jump through hoops repeatedly.
 

Veteran Jim Webb did everything he could to prevent victims of Agent Orange and Burn Pits from receiving the medical treatment they needed.  That's why he can't run for re-election.  Veterans in Virginia pulled their support in 2010 over the Agent Orange issue.  His decision not to seek re-election has to do with the fact that he doesn't have the votes to win.  And he shouldn't after what he did.  There's an important lesson there: A veteran isn't necessarily the one to elect to Congress if you're concerned about veterans issues.


Our Congress is very greedy when it comes to helping people who are not in Ukraine.  


Iraq remains in tatters.  Our Congress saw to that and now they ignore the country they tore apart.  THE ARAB WEEKLY notes:


The storming of Iraq's parliament by hundreds of supporters of populist Shia cleric Moqtada Sadr has piled pressure on his political opponents working to form a government nearly ten months after an election.

There are signs Sadr's pressure on his opponents is starting to spin out of control, with former premier Nuri al-Maliki taking unprecedented security precautions that could augur violent developments in the Iraqi scene.

"Neither side is willing to make any concessions," political scientist Ali al-Baidar said Thursday, one day after crowds breached Baghdad's heavily-fortified Green Zone and staged a parliamentary sit-in, waving flags and demanding change.

The protests are the latest challenge for oil-rich Iraq, which remains mired in a political and a socio-economic crisis despite soaring energy prices.

Escalation of protests and counter protests could force Iraq into the "danger zone" of armed strife, experts fear.

Is Iraq heading towards more violence and protests? Or will it be obliged to hold fresh polls?


THE FINANCIAL TIMES wants you to know that Moqtada has power.  What power?


Besides Joe Biden backing him, what does Moqtada have?  Joe doesn't want Nouri back in power.  That's why US tax dollars were handed over to Moqtada back in August to get him to call for his cult to vote (he was boycotting the election prior to his payout).  It's why the Nouri recording surfaced.  That's allegedly an NSA recording of Nouri.  Whether it is or not, that's what Nouri believes: that the US passed it on to an Iraqi reporter who leaked portions of it on Twitter.  Should Nouri or his protege become prime minister, there will be a huge amount of ill will towards the  US government.  


For those who forgot or missed the leaks a little over a week ago, In a series of Tweets, Tammus Intel covered the recording.

Noori Almaliki: 1- The next phase in Iraq is war, the other speaker says "we are ready" ( after analyzing the records it turned out that the ones who were talking with Noori Almaliki are members of Kataib Hezbollah) #Iraq


2- I told Mustafa Alkadhimi that everyone will protect themselves by their own and Muqtada is coming to kill and slaughter and i will not count on army and police. 3- Muqtada will target me first because i ruined their agendas in Iraq. #Iraq



4- I started arming groups and if he attacks us i will even attack Najaf. 5- Muqtada wants blood and he's coward, he wants money and he robbed Iraq, he thinks that he's the Mahdi. 6- My tribe will protect me and they are ready. #Iraq
7- I call my good supporters to be ready and i will also not count on the PMF because they are also cowards. 8-Iraq is heading to a bloody war that no one will be saved from unless we end Sadr, Halbosi and Barzani project. #Iraq



Joe's the only power that Moqtada has and one has to wonder why the US government is so damn determined right now to support Moqtada -- a right wing, homophobic, sexist who is responsible for the deaths of countless America troops?


If you've seen the footage from the storming of the Parliament -- that day's footage -- you should marvel over one thing.  You see his cult taking down parts of the concrete barrier that protects the Green Zone.  That's how they get entry.  Has the ongoing stalemate so paralyzed the Baghdad-based government that it couldn't stop or was there a stand-down ordered?  



The following sites updated:




Read on ...

Friday, December 18, 2020

Bad Biden!

bad biden


From June 23, 2019, "Bad Biden!'  C.I. noted:



Isaiah's latest THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS.  As Joe Biden digs through America's past, Senator Cory Booker declares, "Bad Biden!"  And Senator Kamala Harris orders, "Get out of yesterday's past, you bad dog!"  Isaiah archives his comics at THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS.

I don't know how I'll be drawing Joe in 2021.  I had drawn him as a dog because that's what he is.  I'll probably try to rethink it when he gets sworn in.  


Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

 Friday, December 18, 2020.  Joe Biden's made the case for a special prosecutor to be assigned to investigate Hunter Biden -- congratulations, Joe, you never know when to keep your mouth shut.


Does Joe Biden not realize that he needs to shut his damn mouth?  We need to word it that way because he just doesn't get it.  He has been elected President of the United States.  His son Hunter Biden is under federal investigation.  Is Joe actively working to get a special prosecutor appointed?


He needs to shut up about his precious candy-ass spoiled son.  Hunter is under federal investigation.  Joe is about to be the head of the federal government.  He does not need to make any comments on Hunter.


Hunter is corrupt as hell and his actions have been outrageous but Joe has claimed over and over to have no knowledge of this business deal or that business deal.  


He has insisted that there was no conflict of interest.  Clearly there was.  But all of that nonsense?  That was before he was elected president.


He is now going to be President of the United States.  That's a powerful position -- probably one of the most powerful in the world -- some would argue that it's the most powerful in the world.


As the head of the federal government, his only position has to be: There is an investigation taking place that will determine whether anything criminal took place or not.  


That is the only position that the President of the United States can have.  


That would be true if Hunter Tylo was under investigation and Joe was commenting on her.  It is even more true when it is his own son that is under investigation.


He is the head of the federal government now.  He cannot be doing this.


He's claiming that he will make sure to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest.


He can't even do that before he's sworn in.


Federal agents are investigating his son.  He is going to be the head of the federal government.  His only position is that the investigation will go forward and conclude whatever it does.  


If he wants to defend Hunter, he can pass the torch to Kamala Harris and let her be sworn in as president.  Then he can make whatever comments about his son he wants.


But defending Hunter publicly while government workers are investigating him?


No, that's a clear conflict of interest.


And Joe's statements and his inability to grasp that?  They demand a special prosecutor.


Is anyone else making this argument?  Or is the entire system cowed and silenced?


I'm not out on a limb on this.  I saw the news right before I got on the treadmill this morning (these snapshots are dictated) and I was appalled   He's stated publicly that he will avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest and then he goes on a comedy show to take softball questions and defend his son?  


No, it's not allowed.  


"But it's his son!"


Not only does it not matter, it's that stinking thinking that led everyone to this point to begin with. 


Where are the editorials calling for a wall between Joe and Hunter?  For the incoming President of the United States to stop trying to influence a federal investigation with his public remarks?


Joe's inability to conduct himself ethically?  Not a surprise but a clear argument -- and a strong one -- for a special prosecutor.


The notion of a special prosecutor has been floated for a few weeks now.  I didn't weigh in or have an opinion one way or another.  If others wanted to make that argument, I was happy to look over them (when I had the time -- haven't thus far) but it wasn't a pressing issue to me either way.  That doesn't mean it wasn't an important issue, it means my plate was already full and it had not been an issue for me at that point.


But then Joe goes on Stephen Colbert's show and launches a defense o Hunter?


Seeing the reports on that this morning and grasping that he's the incoming president?  Yeah, we need a special prosecutor.  Joe's big mouth gets him into trouble yet again.  We are all supposed to be equal in the eyes of justice in the US.  No, it doesn't work that way in reality, but that is the goal.  And we are not equal when the boss of the federal government can't stop declaring that those working under him will determine that his son is innocent.  He's trying to influence the investigation with his remarks.


A special prosecutor is needed.  The only thing that would make me back off from that stance -- make me back off, I'm not speaking for anyone else calling for a special prosecutor -- would be Joe stating he had made a mistake in commenting and that he wouldn't comment any further on an active investigation.  


We are aware of that phrase, right?  How many times did Barack Obama's White House make that statement?

I have no idea whether Donald Trump's White House ever made that statement.  I didn't consider them a standard bearer.  But Barack's White House -- often even Barack himself -- would state repeatedly that they could not comment on an active investigation.


Why?


Because Barack was the head of the government and his remarks, as president, or even the remarks of his staff could be seen as an attempt to influence the outcome of an investigation.  


That would be an abuse of power.


Joe's not even in the White House and he's already using the power that people of America have placed in him for his own personal gain -- to protect his corrupt son.  


The press needs to stop playing games and start doing their damn job.  You have an incoming president publicly interfering with an ongoing investigation by going on entertainment talk shows to defend his son.  


I noted yesterday that "Dr" Jill doesn't have that title now.  She is the First Lady.  It was good enough for Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton.  We do grasp, don't we, that either Michelle or Hillary could have pulled a Jill and said, "I want to be called Barrister Obama or Barrister Clinton" because both women were attorneys.  They had law degrees.  First Lady is the title that the American people are paying for.  If it's not good enough for Jill, she needs to announce that she's not going to occupy the East Wing and she'll pay for any office space she needs out of her own pocket as well as for any staffing needs she has out of her own pocket.  But while she's assuming the role of First Lady, she needs to stop acting like the title is beneath her.


She is not better than Michelle Obama.  (Do we want to get honest about the conflict between those two women for eight years?)  She is not better than Hillary Clinton.  She's not better than Laura Bush, Rosalyn Carter (a great First Lady), Betty Ford, Jaqueline Kennedy, Lady Bird Johnson, Mamie Eisenhower, etc.


She is assuming that office and she needs to start demonstrating some pride in.  Failure to do so is not only spitting on all the women who came before, it's also spiting on the American people and I'm tired of it.


If she wants to expand the role of First Lady, do so.  Rosalyn did, Eleanor Roosevelt did.  Hillary Clinton did.  And the office is better for all their efforts.  I think you could make the argument that Nancy Reagen expanded it as well.  Good for her.  


Let Jill dedicate herself to education or whatever she wants.  But while Joe is President, Jill is First Lady and she and her cult need to get a perspective real damn quick.  I'm not in the mood.  These are not royalty, these are America's servants.  And I'll be happy to bring the whole Biden family back down to earth. 


They're not even in the White House and already they're demonstrating contempt for the offices they will hold.  


I like to tell the following story because (a) I loved Ann Richards and (b) because she was right as she so often is.  It was January 1993.  It was the inauguration of Bill Clinton to his first term as President of the United States.  A number of us were standing around -- I believe Barbra Streisand knows this story because she was present as well.  A man rushes up to Ann excitedly.  She was Governor of Texas at the time.  He identifies himself as being from Texas, tells her what a great job she's doing and calls her "Queen Ann."  Ann had been very friendly up to that point.  At that point, Ann's smile vanished and she got deadly serious.  "Sir," she informed the man, "I am an elected official, elected to serve the state of Texas and that is one of the greatest honors that I or anyone else could have.  I am not a queen nor would I want to be a queen.  What I want is for the people of Texas to look back years from now and say, 'Ann Richards did a solid job serving us.'  This is the United States of America."


Ann was right but she usually was right.  And we really miss out on someone with that kind of dedication and that kind of common sense and, honestly, that kind of love for her country and the people in it.


It is past time for Joe and Jill Biden to start taking the trust that has been placed in them seriously and stop all their nonsense and start addressing the needs of the American people, the people they are supposed to be serving. 


This morning UNDP Iraq Tweeted the following:


Don’t forget to complete our short survey on how UNDP #Iraq can improve engagement with #women and #girls through social media! Survey closes Dec 26. bit.ly/378HOhx
Image
UNAMI and 5 others



That's a real issue.  Where's Joe's concern for the women and girls of Iraq? The ones whose lives his support for the illegal war destroyed?  Where's that?  


Do we need to be Rev Jesse Jackson's son and launch into a tirade about Joe crying for Hunter but he never cried for the Iraqi people or the survivors of Hurricane Katrina or . . 


Professor Guy Burton Tweets about another real issue:


There's little mention of the social protests and demands in Iraq and how they should guide US policy. Instead, it's all about regional politics and ties to Iran. If this is how US policy develops, then disappointing.


 Indeed.  At COUNTERPUNCH, Louis Yako shares the stories of internally displaced persons he met in Iraq:


While observing one of the discussions in a big cold “classroom” in the camp, one young man, Baha, caught my attention while eloquently sharing his thoughts on the importance of public speaking. He talked about how Iraqi young people can only make changes in their society by learning to boldly express themselves. “We need courage. Courage is the key word here – we can’t change the reality of our country if we don’t learn how to communicate and have genuine dialogues with each other.” As participants continued to debate what makes a good “public speaker”, Baha said that, in a sense, even singers and actors can be public speakers because they deliver and make public statements. Their art and creative works are a form of public speaking. He later told me that he greatly appreciated the different views expressed by others. He said that there is something meaningful in discussing with people who see things differently. “That is the only way you learn new ideas and perspectives,” he added.

During one of the session breaks, Baha lit a cigarette and approached me to introduce himself. He is a 24-year young man who highly values education. He wishes to become a teacher at a high school or a university one day. “I am currently studying geography at the University of Duhok. Despite the harsh reality of living in this camp. I insist on finishing my education and becoming a teacher one day,” he said enthusiastically. I asked whether he is enjoying the discussions so far and what drove him to join the program in the first place. Baha said that engaging in a dialogue with his peers is very important for him for two big reasons: “First, I want to become bolder in speaking in front of people.” I asked about the other reason. He went on, “The other thing for me – and am sure for many young participants in the room – is that life in the camp is very harsh and it can be painfully boring and monotonous for young people. You have no idea how stifling it is for a young person to be confined here one year after another.” For Baha, attending these sessions can really make a difference by debating and interacting with each other. “It might be a trivial point for an outsider, but when you are cooped up in a tent in a camp as we are, attending such sessions is a great release. It is a treat, indeed,” he said.

I asked Baha to share more about the harshness and the confinement of living in a camp. “I have been here for five years now. Can you imagine how long and exhausting that is? I fell in love, got engaged, got married, and now have two children. All of this happened here in this camp!” I asked him how it feels to go through all these big life events in the camp, “you first think it is temporary and it will end soon. But years go by and you must live. It is sad for me that my children are ‘camp children’, but I must live my reality. I can’t afford living in denial.” A sad pause followed. I broke the silence by asking about his children. He shared, “my son is three years old and my daughter is so cute – she is just eight months old,” he said with a more cheerful tone as he pulled out his phone to show me their pictures. I said that it must be hard to accept what is supposed to be a short-term condition to become a long term one. “Many people had to painfully come to terms with the fact that they are here to stay for a long time. I will give you an example, many people have been fighting to replace the tents they live in with brick structures. This is a sign of permanency. As it stands, these tents are very dangerous in cases of fire. Many people have died in tent fires. One case happened just here. The mother, in total fear and confusion, rushed inside the tent to fetch her baby whom she thought was in the cradle. She pulled the cradle quickly and ran outside only to find out that the baby wasn’t actually in the cradle.”  Baha thinks that it is unfair not to allow camp residents to erect brick structures to further protect themselves. He said that the tents are unbearably cold in the winter and unbearably hot in the summer. “The rules – I don’t know who came up with them – state that you can’t erect any walls or anything higher than 20 centimeters around your tent.” Baha was frustrated with those who made the rules in the IDP camps. For him, they do not realize how hard it is for displaced people to be there for such long periods of time.

When the session ended, Baha approached me again. He lit another cigarette and started sharing some reflections from the second part of the session. Soon after, another female participant approached me to say hello. Ramzia, a 22-year old female from the same session, shared that she really believes that breaking the fear of expressing oneself in public is very important for today’s youth in Iraq, especially for women. She then went on to tell me why she is interested in engaging in debates and dialogues with other young people in the camp, despite knowing that some male attendees “are narrow-minded and may gossip about girls later.” When I asked her about her dreams and future plans, Ramzia said: “I wish I had the chance to complete my studies. I quit school at 9th grade – since we came to the camp after ISIS invaded our city. In Shingal [aka Sinjar], my brother was the biggest inspiration for me. He loved books and studying, and he really had a big impact on me. When he died in a car accident and we were forced to come to the camp shortly after, I lost all hope and interest in life altogether. I realize now that I must somehow reignite my passion for learning. For young women in our society, if we don’t study, we are expected to get married. I don’t want to marry yet. I am too young and want to experience life. I feel that a program focusing on debates and dialogue is helping me reconnect with my passion for learning with all these discussions. I hope that, in the end, it will help me have the courage to study on my own and take the exam I need to go back to school and compensate for the lost years in the camp.”

The themes of the lost time and being out of place are recurring and consistent in many stories of young people forced to live in IDP camps. Many young people I met with had two primary wishes: some wished to find any chance to leave Iraq (most dreamed about going to Germany). Others wished Iraq would be back as it was before. These two wishes seem contradictory at first glance. Yet, with some pondering, it seems to me these wishes capture the lack of security and stability. In that sense, they are two sides of the same coin in that they represent the lack of security and stability. The desire to leave the country signifies the yearning to build a home in a safe and secure place, despite all the difficulties and humiliation that come with moving to another country as a refugee.  Another recurring theme I noticed when speaking with young men and women at the camp is their insistence to live life, despite all the alienating forces and dirty geopolitical games that forced them into IDP camps in the first place.


The internally displaced are getting even more displaced now as the Iraqi government is moving to shut down all the camps for the displaced.  (The KRG is not currently shutting down the displacement camps in their region.)  That's only going to get worse as corruption has robbed Iraq of so much of its wealth.  AFP 'covers' the economic crisis in every way you can while at the same time avoiding the issue of corruption:


A year of economic agony for pandemic-hit and oil-reliant Iraq is drawing to a close, but a draft 2021 budget involving a hefty currency devaluation could bring more pain for citizens.

Officials who prepared the document told AFP their goal was to aim for "survival" solutions after an unprecedented fiscal crisis brought on by the coronavirus pandemic and the collapse in the price of oil.

Iraq, which relies on oil sales to finance 90 percent of its budget, projects that its economy has shrunk by 11 percent this year, while poverty doubles to 40 percent of the country's 40 million residents.

A slew of measures included in the 2021 budget draft, to be discussed at an extraordinary weekend cabinet session, are an attempt to offer a remedy. 


ALJAZEERA reports:


A leaked draft of Iraq’s state budget sent Iraqis into a panic on Thursday as it confirmed the government’s intentions to devalue the national currency, the Iraqi dinar, and cut salaries to cope with the impacts of a severe economic crisis.

Discussions about devaluating the Iraqi dinar, which has been pegged to the dollar for decades, have been going on for weeks as the government worked to finalise the 2021 budget. The draft law, which has to go through a parliament vote first, gives an anticipated exchange rate of 1,450 Iraqi dinars for the dollar — a significant drop from the central bank’s current official rate of approximately 1,182 dinars for $1.


We noted recently that, per a friend with Amnesty UK, Amnesty was working on a report about the ongoing disappearances in Iraq.  We're still waiting on that, Amnesty.  In the meantime, Belkis Wille (Human Rights Watch) has tackled the issue:


Since I started covering Iraq for Human Rights Watch in 2016, enforced disappearances have been one of my main areas of research because, sadly, they are common. So I was heartened when Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi, shortly after taking office in May, made public commitments to investigate and punish enforced disappearances. Those commitments included a new mechanism to locate victims of enforced disappearances. 

But seven months later, his government has precious little to show for these promises, and disappearances have continued. 

Take the case of Arshad Heibat Fakhry. According to his brother, a group of unidentified armed men arrested Fakhry, 31, and a government minister’s nephew on November 20, at 10:30 p.m. from the Ishtar Hotel in Baghdad. On November 22, a local newspaper reported the two men had been arrested, without specifying who had arrested them, for organizing a “masonic party” and for possessing half a kilo of heroin. His brother told Human Rights Watch that every official they have spoken to about the case alleged instead that Fakhry had organized a party for the LGBT community and had been in possession of drugs - both allegations the brother said are not true. 

His brother said he spoke to the other man arrested with Fakhry, who was released on November 22. That man told him he didn’t know who had arrested them or where they had been held, and that he was blindfolded and brought to his uncle’s ministerial office and released there without any further information. 

Since November 20, Fakhry’s family has visited the offices of five different security agencies and spoken to numerous political party leaders and high-ranking government officials, but every official they go to tells them they have no information on Fakhry’s whereabouts. 

If Prime Minister al-Kadhimi commitments are genuine, and a new mechanism has been created to address enforced disappearances, then that body should urgently contact Fakhry’s family and help them locate him. The government should also prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Failure to do either can only suggest to Iraqis that this government’s commitments are like the human rights commitments of so many former Iraqi governments - just words, nothing more. 


The following sites updated:


Read on ...
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.