Thursday, March 13, 2014

MSNBC's Boldest Lie



MSNBC's Boldest Lie

From November 7, 2010, that's  "MSNBC's Boldest Lie."  C.I. wrote:


Drawing Rachel Maddow?

That face is ugly.

Did you see her on Seth Meyers this week?

Between his ugly face and her ugly face, it was a battle of the TV uglies.

The comic was about how the talk show host tried to pretend she was news.

She's not even public affairs.

She's a talk show host.  Like Merv Griffin or Montel Williams.


Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Thursday, March 13, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, Nouri's assault on Anbar continues, his two-day conference in Baghdad ended today and is only the latest in a long string of Nouri al-Maliki failures, WG Dunlop Tweets a report he should have filed -- it was worth filing,  Nouri executes 7 people, his political rivals get bad news from Baghdad courts and the Justice and Accountability Commission, and much more.



Poor thug Nouri al-Maliki.  He has no accomplishments to point to with pride -- despite two terms as prime minister.  And yet he wants a third term.

How to pose and preen before the people before the vote?

Well he could hold a meaningless 'terrorism' conference.

Before it started, there was so much hope.  Aswat al-Iraq noted days ago that this "2-day conference" was one where "invitations were extended to all world countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Iran"

How quickly the hopes fade.  Saudi Arabia?  Qatar? Tuesday brought news on those invites:

If you ever doubted Nouri al-Maliki's ability to lead, it's on full display right now.  Tomorrow is the big terrorism conference that Brett McGurk's endlessly praised Nouri for.  The State Dept's Brett has praised this effort to bring the region's countries together to address the issue.
But today comes the news that two won't be participating.  NINA reports Qatar and Saudi Arabia have decided not to participate.  This decision comes after Saturday's broadcast of Nouri al-Maliki's interview where he slammed Qatar and Saudi Arabia repeatedly.  (See Saturday's "Nouri 'celebrates' International Women's Day" and "Iraq snapshot.")
He couldn't even keep his big mouth shut until after the conference.



Wednesday, the bad news for Nouri just continued with Al Arabiya News reports, "The UAE recalled its ambassador to Iraq on Wednesday in protest against Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s accusations of Saudi Arabia that the kingdom supports terrorism."  Gulf Times noted:


State Minister for Foreign Affairs Anwar Gargash handed ambassador Mowafak Mahdi Abboud a memorandum protesting Maliki’s “claims that Saudi Arabia supports terrorism,” the official Wam news agency said.
“Such remarks are false and not based on a proper assessment of the situation in the region concerning terrorism, especially as Saudi Arabia plays a significant role in combating all forms of terrorism,” said Gargash.


And Arab News reported, "Bahrain also strongly condemned Saudi bashing by Al-Maliki and his false accusations against the Kingdom."

Let's pause on Nouri's embarrassing failures and note what the conference came up with on their last day. NINA explains, "Baghdad first international anti-terrorism conference [. . .] recommended the conclusion of its works on Thursday to promote international cooperation, exchange of information, to respond to the demands of countries to handover of criminals, cooperation and take necessary measures to dying terrorism resources."

That's it?

A two-day conference and all they can come with is: Exchange phone numbers?

Most people can accomplish that within ten minutes of entering a bar.

Two days to get digits on a cocktail napkin?

Even when you look for a Nouri success, you still come up with failure.

Yet Nouri's spokesperson Qassim Atta had insisted, "Baghdad conference of anti-terrorism will come out with the important results and recommendations to enhance the international desire to eliminate terrorism and to hold the countries supporting it."  Kitabat delicately phrases the conclusion and results of the conference as "modest."

Sadly, even a modest term like "modest" is overly generous.

Let's note a speech -- or the press release on a speech.  Click here for the speech in full by Nickolay Mladenov.  He is United Nation's Secretary-Genral Ban Ki-Moon's envoy in Iraq.  This is UNAMI's press release on Mladenov's speech:

Baghdad, 12 March 2014 – Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Iraq (SRSG), Mr. Nickolay Mladenov, today urged the political leaders of Iraq to put their differences aside and work together to address the terrorist threat that seeks to tear the fabric of Iraqi society. 

At the opening of the First International Counter-Terrorism Conference that started today in Baghdad, SRSG Mladenov noted that the conference can send an important message to the public, “a message of solidarity with a nation that has shown unparalleled resilience and a continuing commitment to build a democratic state at a moment when Iraq stands at a crucial cross-road on its journey towards stability and prosperity”. 
“Iraq will either succumb to violence, or come together and build a democratic state that protects human rights and is inclusive for all its citizens”, said Mr. Mladenov, adding that “finding ways to put an end to terrorism will not be easy, some difficult decisions will have to be made – but together the Government and people of Iraq, with the support of the international community, can find ways to do so”. 
Mr. Mladenov expressed the United Nations’ deepest sympathy to the Iraqi people for the terrible toll that they endure on a daily basis and honored the brave men and women of the Iraqi Security Forces who risk their lives every day to protect citizens from the threat of terrorism. 
He underlined that “the concept of human rights is one of the greatest assets in finding sustainable solutions to countering extremism and terrorism as well as the full community involvement in decisions relating to their security”. “Any comprehensive approach would be incomplete if it were not matched with broad political dialogue, inclusive economic and social policies and community reconciliation”, the UN Envoy noted. He also highlighted the utmost importance of “investing in police and security forces that have appropriate resources and are appropriately trained, while respecting the rule of law and human rights, in particular regarding arrests, detentions and trials”. 
Moving beyond the national level, SRSG Mladenov stressed that only within the framework of constructive regional and international cooperation, fight against terrorism can succeed. He reminded the audience of the establishment in 2005 of the UN Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF) saying that “through this Task Force the UN can assist Iraq in promoting its ability to contribute to the international effort to counter terrorism and implement the four pillars of the Global Counter Terrorism Strategy”. 
In concluding, Mr. Mladenov assured the Iraqi people that they were not alone and that “UNAMI and the United Nations in Iraq would continue to work with them and their elected representatives in promoting political dialogue and investing in its biggest resource, its citizens”.


We'll note the speech in another entry -- in full -- but it's too long for this one.

It's the only speech which will get significant attention because UNAMI has released it.  It won't get significant attention due to journalists hearing it in person.

See, another of Nouri's failures with this two-day conference?  The press.



Ghazanfar Laibi (Al Mada) reports that journalists were prepared to cover the conference in depth but were kept out and one of the reasons given was security snags leading one journalist to call the conference the most poorly organized and worst he'd ever attended. And while kept out of the conference proper, they were given press releases with meaningless data and access -- in an area described as "a narrow box" -- to file reports in a room with no internet lines or connections.  State TV, controlled by Nouri al-Maliki, Al-Iraqiya broadcast fluff.  That's not surprising, Deborah Amos wrote a paper on how Nouri used Al-Iraqiya to campaign in 2010 -- to illegally campaign -- in the parliamentary elections.

Kitabat explains that while every other news outlet  -- Iraqi and foreign news outlets -- was prevented from entering the main hall of the conference, Al-Iraqiya was allowed to enter and to interview various participants.  Ghazzanfar Laibi adds that one journalist -- not with Al-Iraqiya -- explains that not only were the journalists prevented from entering the conference to observe it but 'photo ops'?  They were all given one minute to take photos.  (All except Al-Iraqiya which roamed freely.)


AFP's WG Dunlop managed to find coverage despite being denied entry:


  • At the office after a successful morning of not being allowed into Iraq CT conference. Highlight: the falafel I bought on the way back.
  • Loaded, unattended M-16 later replaced by equally unattended Kalashnikov at an entrance to Iraq CT conference.
  • Soldier has left his loaded M-16 in guard shack at entrance to Iraq counter-terrorism conference.


  • Despite being widely discredited, fake bomb detectors still in use by Iraq counter-terrorism conference security.




  • Nouri needs to be prosecuted for using those 'magic wands' (fake bomb detectors).  For those unfamiliar with the magic wands, let's drop back to the June 8, 2010 snapshot:



    In November of last year, Rod Nordland (New York Times) explained the 'bomb detectors' in use in Iraq: "The small hand-held wand, with a telescopic antenna on a swivel, is being used at hundreds of checkpoints in Iraq. But the device works 'on the same principle as a Ouija board' -- the power of suggestion -- said a retired United States Air Force officer, Lt. Col. Hal Bidlack, who described the wantd as nothing more than an explosive divining rod." They are the ADE 651s with a ticket price of between $16,500 and $60,000 and Iraq had bought over 1,500.  More news came with arrests on January 22: "Caroline Hawley (BBC Newsnight -- link has text and video) reports that England has placed an export ban on the ADE-651 'bomb detector' -- a device that's cleaned Iraq's coffers of $85 million so far. Steven Morris (Guardian) follows up noting that, 'The managing director [Jim McCormick] of a British company that has been selling bomb-detecting equipment to security forces in Iraq was arrested on suspicion of fraud today'." From the January 25th snapshot:



    Riyad Mohammed and Rod Norldand (New York Times) reported on Saturday that the reaction in Iraq was outrage from officials and they quote MP Ammar Tuma stating, "This company not only caused grave and massive losses of funds, but it has caused grave and massive losses of the lives of innocent Iraqi civilians, by the hundreds and thousands, from attacks that we thought we were immune to because we have this device."  Despite the turn of events, the machines continue to be used in Iraq but 'now' an investigation into them will take place orded by Nouri. As opposed to months ago when they were first called into question. Muhanad Mohammed (Reuters) adds that members of Parliament were calling for an end to use of the machines on Saturday.  Martin Chulov (Guardian) notes the US military has long -- and publicly -- decried the use of the machines,  "The US military has been scathing, claiming the wands contained only a chip to detect theft from stores. The claim was based on a study released in June by US military scientists, using x-ray and laboratory analysis, which was passed on to Iraqi officials." 


    Today the BBC reports police raids took place at "Global Tech, of Kent, Grosvenor Scientific, in Devon, and Scandec, of Nottingham. Cash and hundreds of the devices have been seized, and a number of people are due to be interviewed under caution on suspicion of fraud."  Michael Peel and Sylvia Pfeifer (Financial Times of London) add, "Colin Cowan, head of City police's overseas anti-corruption unit, said investigators were seeking further information from the public about the manufacture, sale and distribution of the devices. Det Supt Cowan said: 'We are concerned that these items present a real physical threat to anyone who may rely on such a device for protection'." 



    The magic wands were a con.  They did not work.  They weren't scientific but they were a con job.  This is from the  May 2nd (May 2, 2013) snapshot:



    The wands didn't work, they were never going to work.  The liar who sold them, and got rich off them, James McCormick, was convicted last month.   Robert Booth and Meirion Jones (Guardian) report, "A jury at the Old Bailey found Jim McCormick, 57, from near Taunton, Somerset, guilty on three counts of fraud over a scam that included the sale of £55m of devices based on a novelty golfball finder to Iraq. They were installed at checkpoints in Baghdad through which car bombs and suicide bombers passed, killing hundreds of civilians. Last month they remained in use at checkpoints across the Iraqi capital."  Today, Jake Ryan (Sun) reports, McCormick, who is 57, was sentenced to a "maximum ten years today."Robert Booth (Guardian) notes Saad al-Muttalibi ("adviser to Nouri al-Maliki) is insisting Nouri's considering suing on behalf of the victims.  Actually, the families of the victims should be suing Nouri for allowing those things to be used for the last years, even after the wands were globally revealed to be a joke.  The Belfast Telegraph notes that McCormick "showed no reaction as he was told his 'callous confidence trick' was the worst fraud imaginable."  Jake Ryan quotes Judge Richard Hone stating, "The device was useless, the profit outrageous and your culpability as a fraudster has to be placed in the highest category.  Your profits were obscene.  You have neither insight, shame or any sense of remorse."


    We long ago noted that Nouri's continued use of these magic wands after the conviction of James McCormick meant that Iraq couldn't sue (and win) for all the money they wasted purchasing this junk.  For there to be a successful lawsuit, Nouri would have had to responded by immediately pulling the wands and filing.  But that didn't happen.  Instead the dumb ass Nouri continued to use them even after a respected court found against the manufacturer and court testimony established these wands were worthless.
    It doesn't matter that they don't work.
    If you buy junk and use it, it's on you.
    Nouri lost the window for a lawsuit.
    The people of Iraq have not.  They can (and should) sue the Iraqi government for using magic wands at a time when bombs sweep Iraq daily.
    WG Dunlop got a story -- though he doesn't appear to have written it yet -- out of the conference by observing the lax security.
    The conference took place inside the Green Zone, that would be the same Green Zone that suffered a mortar attack today.  It was embarrassing, yet another failure to add to Nouri's long list of failures which is why he and his flunkies are by their rush to deny it even happened.  But a security source tells World Bulletin that, while "the shell didn't hit the presidential palace, which is hosting the conference," it did leave one man injured.

    Reporters weren't the only ones prevented entry to the conference.  Mohammad Sabah (Al Mada) reports that Nouri also refused to allow rival politicians to take part including Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi and the leader of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq Ammar al-Hakim.

    When not shutting out his rivals from his photo-ops, Nouri gets them removed from the running.

    From the March 4th snapshot:

     We have little room here but Alsumaria is reporting that another arrest warrant has been issued against Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi -- this one calling him an enemy of the state.  We're bringing it up because it's thought that this is a series of warrants and that one not yet issued, but which may be issued, is for Moqtada al-Sadr, cleric and movement leader.
    I'm not accusing Moqtada al-Sadr of any crimes.  I don't believe Tareq is guilty of any.  But an Iraqi MP e-mailed about this story and the rumors in Parliament that Moqtada fled to Iran because he was tipped off that the Nouri had ordered the criminal court to prepare a warrant for him.
    Cleric and movement Moqtada al-Sadr announced his political retirement February 15th.  February 18th, he delivered a speech --  CounterPunch posted the speech in full  -- emphasizing his decision. February 26th,  NINA noted the rumors that Moqtada left Iraq today, "The sources noted in a press statement that Mr. Muqtada al-Sadr left today's afternoon the city of Najaf heading to the Islamic Republic of Iran in order to complete his religious studies and stay away from the political scene as he officially announced for all Iraqis."
    Again, I'm not accusing Moqtada of crimes.  I do accuse Nouri of using the courts to go after his political rivals.  And I'm noting this due to an e-mail from an Iraqi MP who believes that the warrant against Tareq (who's already been illegally convicted in Iraq and sentenced to the death penalty four or five times now) is part of a series of warrants Nouri has had the Iraqi courts prepare against his rivals.



    Today?  All Iraq News reports two candidates have been arrested and charged with terrorism.  The two are members of Saleh al-Mutlaq's coalition: Faris Fahad Taha al-Faris and Emad Ahmed Natah.

    al-Mutlaq, of course, was targeted by Nouri at the end of 2011.  And, of course, he was also targeted in February 2010 when Nouri's Justice and Accountability Commission refused to allow Saleh to run in the parliamentary election insisting the man who is now the Deputy Prime Minister of Iraq was a "Ba'athist."

    Parliamentary elections are supposed to be held April 30th.

    MP Sabah al-Saadi won't be running.


    Has he decided he no longer wants to be in Parliament?

    No.  Iraq Times reports that the Baghdad judiciary that Nouri controls (that's not disputable although the press pretends it is -- even the State Dept has admitted that in open Congressional hearings) has announced they've determined he won't be able to run for re-election.

    al-Saadi is a rather famous MP so it's surprising that not one western news or 'news' outlet has managed to report on his being kicked out of the upcoming election.  Sabah al-Saadi was the MP and his criticism of Nouri resulted in Nouri going crazy.   September 22, 2011, Nouri swore out an arrest warrant for al-Saadi. Let's drop back to the September 20, 2011 snapshot:


    Meanwhile Dar Addustour reports MP Sabah al-Saadi is stating there is no arrest warrant out against him and that the claims of one stem from Nouri al-Maliki attempting to cover up his own corruption and he states Nouri has deliberately kept the three security ministries vacant and he charges Nouri is willing "to sell Iraq to maintain his hold on power."  Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) observes, "The increasing violence is likely to be taken as a further sign of political gridlock in the Iraqi government, in particular the inability of Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki to name permanent ministers for the key security posts 18 months after the March 2010 elections."



    For those who've forgotten (or never knew), Nouri's arrest warrant was received by Parliament and . . . nothing.  As an MP, al-Saadi has legal immunity (until his term is up -- if he can run for re-election it may be time for him to leave Iraq).  Only Parliament can remove that immunity -- check the Iraqi Constitution.  From the September 22, 2011 snapshot:

    Hossam Acommok (Al Mada) reports on Moqtada al-Sadr's criticism of Nouri al-Maliki swearing out an arrest warrant for Sabah al-Saadi claiming that criticizing Nouri is a threat to national security (see yesterday's snapshot). al-Sadr has called out the move and compared it to a new dictatorship and issued a call for the government to work on inclusion and not exclusion. Another Al Mada report notes Sadr declaring that Nouri needs to drop this issue and focus on the needed political work. It's noted that the Sadr bloc waited until Moqtada issued a statement to weigh in and that the Kurdish Regional Government President Massoud Barazni declared that the Kurdish bloc would not support a vote to strip al-Saadi of his immunity. As a member of Parliament, Sabah al-Saadi should be immune to Nouri's arrest warrant for the 'crime' of speech. Currently, the warrant exists but cannot be executed due to the immunity members of Parliament have. So in addition to filing charges against al-Saadi, Nouri and State of Law (his political slate) are also attempting to strip a member of Parliament of his immunity.

    The US State Dept has refused, for two work days in a row, to hold press briefings.  They haven't refused to take tax dollars and put them in their pockets.  When they finally do address the press again, maybe someone can ask them about how Nouri is using the courts and the Justice and Accountability Commission to eliminate his political rivals?

    Mishaan al-Jubouri is a former MP who is running in the upcoming parliamentary elections . . . or thought he was.  Kitabat reports Nouri's court issued an arrest warrant for al-Jubouri.  Dropping back to the April 12, 2013 snapshot:

    Al Mada reports that the Electoral Commission has denied Mishan al-Jubouri the opportunity to participate in the elections due to his criminal record.  His party also won't appear on ballots.  This is seen as a serious "blow" for Nouri who had been publicly promising he would pardon him and publicly embracing al-Jubouri in an attempt to take support away from Iraqiya (al-Jubouri is Sunni).  State of Law (and Nouri) are seen as anti-Sunni.  Alsumaria adds that the Electoral Commission was told by the United Nations that al-Jubouri could not run due to his criminal record and that, if he ran, they would stop elections in all of Salahuddin Province.


    Nouri lost use for al-Jubouri in the second half of 2013 and the pardon promise vanished.


    The Justice and Accountability Commission was supposed to have ended.  When Nouri signed off on the 2007 White House benchmarks, that was supposed to have ended the JAC.  It didn't because Nouri's a damn liar whose word cannot be trusted.  Which is why the Justice and Accountability Commission remains today and works overtime to eliminate Nouri's rivals.  All Iraq News notes Najih Hamoud has just been excluded.  From the April 30th elections?  No, from the Iraqi Football Association elections.  He's currently the head of it but the JAC has determined that he is or was a "Ba'athist" and, as part of "the process of DeBa'thification" have announced he cannot run.

    Again, deBa-athification was supposed to have ended in 2007 -- it was one of the White House benchmarks Nouri signed off on.  If there was a functional US Congress, they might hold hearings on this.

    When not using the Baghdad courts or the JAC to eliminate his political rivals, Nouri can always just have them put to death.  AFP reports Nouri had 7 prisoners executed today.  AFP misses a bit.  4 were killed for 'terrorism.'  3 for being 'Ba'athists,' among other things, supposedly.

    1 of the 3?  All Iraq News explains one was executed for "crimes such as killing the father of MP, Safiya al-Suhail, who was opponent for Saddam Hussein."  Where are the Western news or 'news' outlets?

    Nowhere to be found.  They can't even Nouri  pushing a bill which would allow fathers to marry off their daughters at the age of nine-years-old.  Felicity Arbuthnot (Dissident Voice) notes:

    Less than a month before the 11th anniversary of the illegal US-led invasion of Iraq, the near destruction of much of the country, heritage, culture, secularism, education, health services and all State institutions, the country is poised to revert “two thousand years” say campaigners.
    On February 25th, Iraq’s Cabinet approved a draft law lowering the age of legal marriage for females to nine years old.
    Iraq was, prior to the invasion, a fiercely secular country, with a broadly equal male, female workforce and with women benefiting from a National Personal Status Law, introduced in 1959, which remained “one of the most liberal in the Arab world, with respect to women’s rights.”
    The legal age for marriage was set at eighteen, forced marriages were banned and polygamy restricted. Cohesion between communities was enhanced and fostered by “eliminating the differential treatment of Sunnis and Shiites under the law (and erasing differentiation) between the various religious communities …” Women’s rights in divorce, child custody and inheritance were an integral part of the Law, with Article 14 stating that all Iraqis are equal under the law.



    When not trying to engage in human trafficking, Nouri likes to break international law and treaties which is why his War Crimes continue as he uses collective punishment on Anbar Province.  National Iraqi News Agency reports 130 civilians have been killed ("including women and children") and 740 injured in Falluja since the start of Nouri's assault according to Falluja General Hospital.  Anadolu Agency observes, "Since last December, the army has waged a major operation in Anbar with the stated aim of flushing out Al-Qaeda-linked militants.  Many local Sunni tribes opposed to Iraq's Shiite-dominated government, however, continue to voice anger over the operation's mounting civilian death toll."




    Today's violence?


    National Iraqi News Agency reports a battle in Anbar left Colonel Feras Hamoudi al-Sudani dead, a Mosul suicide car bomber took his own life and the life of 1 Iraqi soldier with three more left injured, 1 man ("teacher and restaurant owner") was shot dead in Muqdadiyah, Joint Operations Command announced they killed 24 suspects, a Kirkuk sticky bombing left one person injured, a battle in Ramadi left 3 Iraqi soldiers dead, a Mosul battle left 1 Iraqi soldier dead and another injured, 1 "intelligence officer and his driver were killed northwest of Baquba,"  Nineveh Inedependent Elections employee Mohammed Mu'aiyad was injured in a shooting near his Mosul home,  Alsumaria adds an eastern Baghdad bobming left two people injured, a suicide bomber took his own life while attacking a western Anbar bridge (it collapsed) and killing 4 people while leaving six more injured, a bombing targeting the Hawija Municipality Director's home left four people injured,  and a Sadr City bombing left four people injured.


    Lastly, Iraq has 18 provinces.  Had.  Today the number rose to 19.  National Iraqi News Agency reports:

    Head of Kurdistan Regional Government Nechirvan Barzani, signed the decision to transfer Halabja district to a province. so to be the fourth in Kurdistan region and ninetieth in the federal Iraq , As reported by a familiar source in Arbil to NINA today.
    Head of Kurdistan region, Massoud Barzani earlier called on the provincial government to take the necessary administrative procedures to quickly convert Halabja to a province and not waiting for a response from the central government. 




















     

    the guardian
    martin chulov
    bbc news








    Read on ...

    Wednesday, March 12, 2014

    Nouri The Child Molester


    Yesterday's comic has some questions in the e-mails so I'm posting quickly on my lunch hour.


    I had many ideas for my comics for The Common Ills -- there's pressure there that I don't feel when I'm doing comics for the community newsletters.  So I had four ideas for comics and thought I'd do three on Sunday.

    Time ran out.  

    On Monday, I did "Nouri The Child Molester" and "The 'Patriot' takes a Stand" and posted both to Flickr that day.  

    Did I want two in one day, C.I. asked?  

    No, I decided it would be better to spread them out and went with the 'patriot' one as my Monday choice.  

    On Tuesday, C.I. posted the second.

    There was no censorship.

    The comic disappeared for over 20 minutes about a half hour after she posted it.

    Why?

    From a note added to "Nouri bungles again:"



    [Dona note:  C.I/'s post was changed from "nine" to five and Isaiah's comic redone -- both are at Flickr -- to change nine to five by me.  I wrongly thought an e-mail was correct about an error.  The e-mail was one error, my changing the things was the second error.  My apologies to community members, readers, C.I. and Isaiah.]


    A reporter e-mailed the public account saying my comic was wrong on the age, that it was five and not nine.

    Dona trusted the reporter and didn't want me or C.I. embarrassed.  She took the comic down and fixed the 9 to a 5 in photo shop.

    I have no problem at all with that.  

    I'm glad she tried to protect me.  I'm sure C.I. is as well.

    But it turned out C.I. and I were right.

    Dona found out and then corrected it.

    At some point,  between nine and ten p.m. EST, the comic stopped displaying and there was an error message.

    That probably had to do with Blogger or Flickr and the traffic issue.  It's happened before.

    So, no censorship took place.

    A journalist thought there was a mistake (I'll assume he was sincere), Dona rushed to fix it, when she found there was no mistake, she restored the comic with the five and added her note.


    One person wondered if I was angry about Dona changing the comic?

    Repeating: I'm glad she tried to protect me.

    Dona has her own life which includes work, Jim and a child.  I thank her for caring.  I thank her for trying to fix my mistake and then, when finding I hadn't made a mistake, rushing to fix her own.

    Dona's a wonderful person and we have no problem.  

    Here's my original comic:




    Click on it to go to Flickr and you'll see it was uploaded March 10th.


    And here's the same comic but with Dona changing the "9" to a "5."





    Click on the image and you'll see it was uploaded March 11th (yesterday).



    Not only was I not mad, I told Dona that the mistake actually helped. 

    The whole point of the cartoon is to raise awareness that thug Nouri is trying to lower the age of marriage for girls to 9-years-old.  That's disgusting and criminal.

    The mix-up on the ages yesterday actually attracted more attention than would have happened without it.  So not only am I not mad, I'm also glad it happened.


    Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for yesterday:



    Tuesday, March 11, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, Nouri's assault on Anbar continues, Moqtada al-Sadr supporters continue to protest Nouri, NPR continues to ignore the protests in Iraq, everyone but Human Rights Watch appears to be silent on Nouri's latest assault on Iraqi females, and much more.



    Why can't, in the US, grown ups have a conversation without a bunch of partisan b.s.?

    Maybe because the media refuses to inform.

    Alice Fordham's joined NPR (a free lancer who worked previously for The Times of London, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and Christian Science Monitor among other outlets during the Iraq War). Between her nonsense and David Green's idiotic introduction on Morning Edition (NPR) to Fordham's bad report, it's hard to know which is worse.

    Both operate under the premise that the assault on Anbar Province is appropriate.

    International law and treaties beg to differ.

    But not only does NPR ignore the law -- including the long established Geneva Conventions -- they also refuse to talk about how things got so bad in Anbar.

    If you're a community member or regular or even semi-reader of the Iraq snapshots, you do know what's going on.  But if you read through the comments -- the ones they allowed -- to Fordham's bad 'report,' you know a lot of people have no idea what's going on but they are so quick to offer 'insight' -- and it's all connected to Bully Boy Bush.

    If you depend on NPR's 'reporting' on Iraq, you're dazed and confused.  In fact, we'll be honoring one of NPR's biggest moment of lying about Iraq in the next few weeks.  We called them out real time.  No one else bothered.  They aired a report that undermined democracy and violated every ethical journalistic principle.  It also didn't get the facts accurate.

    Here's the closest they got to honest on Morning Edition today:


    FORDHAM:  Zaid Al-Ali, who recently published a book, "The Struggle for Iraq's Future," says that the problems are broader than that. In Sunni-dominated places like Anbar, they won't be solved by security measures alone. He thinks that chronic unemployment also needs to be addressed and, more importantly, entrenched sectarian practices by the security forces. Detention without charge and torture are far more common in places like Anbar, he says, which feeds hatred of the government.


    ZAID AL-ALI: It's been a major issue because there is a lot of abuse of detainees in Iraq. And there are a lot of cases - everyone knows about this, this is not a secret - there are a lot of cases of people being detained for no reason and for very long periods of time, without access to attorneys, without access to judges, without access to any type of recourse. And that really needs to change extremely urgently.


    Wow.

    That's enough to make people take to the streets and protest.

    Oh, wait, it did.

    Since December 21, 2012, protests have been ongoing in Iraq.

    Why are they protesting?

    The issues are numerous.  In February 2013, Layla Anwar (An Arab Woman Blues) summed up the primary issues as follows:

    - End of Sectarian Shia rule
    - the re-writing of the Iraqi constitution (drafted by the Americans and Iranians)
    - the end to arbitrary killings and detention, rape and torture of all detainees on basis of sect alone and their release
    - the end of discriminatory policies in employment, education, etc based on sect
    - the provision of government services to all
    - the end of corruption
    - no division between Shias and Sunnis, a one Islam for all Iraqi Muslims and a one Iraq for all Iraqis.


    Still not getting why Alice Fordham, if she's going to report on Anbar, needs to mention the protests?

    Let's go to Human Rights Watch, "Government security forces had withdrawn from Anbar province after provoking a tribal uprising when they raided a Sunni protest camp in Ramadi on December 30, killing 17 people."  This is how the assault on Anbar begins.

    If Alice Fordham and NPR want to report on the assault, they're required to note how it started.

    Are their terrorists in Anbar?

    I'm sure there are just as many terrorists in Anbar as there is anywhere -- including in the NPR newsroom.

    But what made people wearing masks (or at least scarves covering the lower half of their faces) go out into the streets of Anbar?

    Nouri's assault on the protesters.

    That was only one assault, there have been so many more.

    Let's again note Sunil Patel's strong piece at Fair Observer which includes:


    As violence in Fallujah escalates to near-unprecedented levels, the entire narrative of the fighting seems to evade a number of key points. Namely, this fighting was not precipitated by the capture of Sunni strongholds by al-Qaeda or the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS).
    The precursor to the fighting between Iraqi government forces and Sunni tribesmen of Anbar was a result of a ruthless policy of repression, aimed at nationwide protest camps opposing government measures on public services, counterterrorism, illegal house raids and a perpetuation of sectarian violence, as well as a number of other policies that continue to marginalize Sunni communities.
    The Ramadi protest camps in al-Anbar have been at the center of demonstrations for the past year. It was on December 30  — a week after Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki had threatened to "burn down" the camps — that special forces (SWAT) and the army descended upon the Ezz and Karama Square to crush protests, which had gained momentum after the arrest of Sunni MP Ahmed al-Alwani and the murder of his brother and five of his security guards.
    Two witnesses reported to Human Rights Watch that SWAT and the army had arrived in a procession of military Humvees, pick-up trucks, and armored vehicles to clear the squares. All this just seven hours after Defense Minister Saadoun al-Dulaimi had negotiated the release of Alwani on the condition that the camps were to be cleared within 48 hours.
    This is not the first attempt by government forces to clear protest camps. In April 2013, SWAT and the army opened fire on more than a thousand protestors in Hawija, south of Kirkut, killing 50 people and leaving 110 injured. The event passed without as much as a whimper in the press, let alone widespread condemnation.


    An e-mail noted that the link on "protestors in Hawija" is "worthless and goes to a 2005 report."

    Take it up with Fair Observer, I don't edit people's links for them.

    But we have covered it in real time so I'll provide those links.   January 7th, Nouri's forces assaulted four protesters in Mosul,  January 24th,  Nouri's forces sent two protesters (and one reporter) to the hospital,  and March 8th, Nouri's force fired on protesters in Mosul killing three.


    All of that and more appeared to be a trial run for what was coming, the April 23rd massacre of a peaceful sit-in in Hawija which resulted from  Nouri's federal forces storming in.  Alsumaria noted Kirkuk's Department of Health (Hawija is in Kirkuk)  announced 50 activists have died and 110 were injured in the assault.   AFP reported the death toll rose to 53 dead.  UNICEF noted that the dead included 8 children (twelve more were injured).


    In February 2013, Nouri put on a show about 'listening' to the protesters.

    He never did.

    The ridiculous press trumped his statements as facts.

    How stupid is the press today?

    Even 30 years ago, his remarks would have been treated as words and the press would have taken a wait-and-see posture.  Instead, they hollered "End of story!"  When it wasn't.

    Nouri's refusal to meet the demands of the protesters, his desire to attack them physically and with words (he's called them "terrorists" since 2011).

    Now his failed promises are just stripped of the story by the likes of Alice Fordham.

    This isn't reporting.

    This isn't even bad reporting.

    It's misinformation.

    Drama Queen Ta-Nehsi Coates at the war mongering Atlantic magazine offers "As Though Iraq Never Happened."  Yeah, for those us paying attention, which does not include Coates, is does seem like it never happened.  But what may be more insulting is that Coates thought he had the information to write an article.  He uses "Iraq" hoping for clicks as he attacks Condoleezza Rice.


    To put it mildly, we're not fans here of No-One-Could-Have-Guessed Condi Rice.

    But we're also not stupid.  We've repeatedly called her out on Iraq by noting she held no expertise on the topic, we suggested she stick to topics that she knows something about.

    Ta-Nehsi Coates calls her out for weighing in on Ukraine.  Guess what?

    Russia is Condi's area of expertise.

    Doesn't mean she's right in her opinions, but it is the area she was trained in.

    If you've got an issue with her interpretation or take, by all means call her out on it and use any tone you wish.

    But you look pretty stupid slamming her for weighing in on the topic without even grasping that this actually is a topic she studied.  At great length.

    Iraq is on fire and has been since it became clear Nouri wasn't going to honor the White House brokered Erbil Agreement of 2010.  If you're going to mention Iraq today, how about making it about something current?

    How about you find something more productive than Bush hatred and Bush bashing?  And how about you stop pretending you care about Iraq when you've said nothing about the attacks on the protesters or anything else that's happened in the last 12 months?

    You're ignorant of Iraq and your ignorance fuels the public's ignorance.  So stop pretending you're writing about Iraq when you're not.


    I also find the high horse Coates is on to be ridiculous.  Condi Rice sold the Iraq War.  I don't dispute it.  But if she's unqualified to speak on topics because of that, I guess that means The Atlantic will be shutting down since it also sold the illegal war?

    When people could lie and whore freely, outlets like The Atlantic 'covered' the Iraq War.

    Now they have no interest except to mislead -- in other words, they've circled back to 2002.

    It's really sad that the best The Atlantic can offer on Iraq is Coates' nonsense.  Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Nouri The Child Molester" went up earlier today.  He's a cartoonist but he can take on Nouri pushing a bill that would drop the age of marriage for girls to nine-years-old.

    Isaiah can do that.  Why can't The Atlantic?

    Why can't Ms. magazine?

    Why can't Women's Media Center?

    The leader of a country is putting his weigh behind a bill that (a) lowers the age for girls to marry to nine-years-old and (b) that strips mothers of their custodial rights and hands all custodial rights over to the father.

    This isn't some stray bill in the US Congress from some member you've never heard of.  This is a bill that passed Nouri's Cabinet of Members and that Nouri has now forwarded to the Parliament.

    This is not unimportant.

    Alice Fordman and NPR can continue to ignore it, that won't make it unimportant.

    Brett McGurk can refuse to call it out.

    It doesn't change that this is a dangerous bill and, by not publicly calling it out, the world is not tolerating it, it's encouraging it.

    I don't get these little War Whore Drama Queens forever advocating war here, there and everywhere.  They can scream for bombs and killing.  But the same gasbags in the press can't say a word -- we're just asking for words here -- to condemn a move to lower the age of marriage for Iraqi girls to nine-years-old.

    You're a worthless outlet, a worthless gas bag, a worthless journalist, a worthless government if you're unable to condemn Nouri's bill.



    Who has any guts?  Turns out Human Rights Watch does:

    (Baghdad) – Iraq’s Council of Ministers should withdraw a new draft Personal Status Law and ensure that Iraq’s legal framework protects women and girls in line with its international obligations. The pending legislation would restrict women’s rights in matters of inheritance and parental and other rights after divorce, make it easier for men to take multiple wives, and allow girls to be married from age nine.
    The draft law, called the Jaafari Personal Status Law, is based on the principles of the Jaafari school of Shia religious jurisprudence, founded by Imam Jaafar al-Sadiq, the sixth Shia imam. Approved by the Council of Ministers on February 25, 2014, it must now be approved by the parliament to become law.
    “Passage of the Jaafari law would be a disastrous and discriminatory step backward for Iraq’s women and girls,” said Joe Stork, deputy Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “This personal status law would only entrench Iraq’s divisions while the government claims to support equal rights for all.”



    It would be a disaster.  Today and yesterday, I was pressing State Dept friends on this and they are of the opinion that, "It'll never pass Parliament, nothing does!"  So it's okay to ignore it.

    This only passed the Dabinet because of Nouri.  Do we grasp that?

    Less than 30 voted on this.

    How is that possible?

    The Kurds and Iraqiya walked for good reasons.  They walked long ago.

    This is on Nouri and his supporters.  It passed with his a-okay and he then forwarded it to the Parliament.

    Whether it dies or not, it needs to be condemned.  To ignore it is to embrace it.

    Back to Human Rights Watch:

    The draft law would cover Iraq’s Shia citizens and residents, a majority of the population of 36 million. It includes provisions that prohibit Muslim men from marrying non-Muslims, legalizes marital rape by stating that a husband is entitled to have sex with his wife regardless of her consent, and prevents women from leaving the house without permission from their husbands. The law would automatically grant custody over any child age two or older to the father in divorce cases, lower the marriage age to nine for girls and fifteen for boys, and even allow girls younger than nine to be married with a parent’s approval.
    Justice Minister Hassan al-Shimmari introduced the draft law to the Council of Ministers on October 27, 2013. In December, the council said it would postpone considering the draft until after legislative elections scheduled for April 30, 2014, and after the supreme Shia religious authority (marji’iya) approved the draft, which it has not yet done. But the council went ahead and approved it on February 25 despite strong opposition from rights advocates and some religious leaders.


    Saturday, Iraqi women protested in Baghdad. They had to do that in 2005 as the Constitution was written because the US government was happy to sell Iraqi women down the river.  Apparently, that's still the case today.  Iraqi women have shown far more courage and strengthen then US government officials could ever dream of.

    Back to Human Rights Watch:


    Iraq’s current Personal Status Law (Law 188 of 1959), which applies to all Iraqis regardless of sect, sets the legal age for marriage at 18, but allows for a judge to permit girls as young as 15 to be married in “urgent” cases. In December 2012, the Lebanese news outlet Al-Safir reported that rates of early marriage of girls had risen drastically in Iraq in the previous decade. In 2013, the Population Reference Bureau, an international organization, reported that “the decline in early marriage has stopped in … Iraq,” citing its own statistics that 25 percent of girls marry before age 18 and 6 percent before age 15. The draft law’s provisions would legalize, rather than try to reverse, Iraq’s growing child marriage problem, Human Rights Watch said.
    The draft law violates the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), which Iraq ratified in 1986, by giving fewer rights to women and girls on the basis of their gender. It also violates the Convention on Rights of the Child, which Iraq ratified in 1994, by legalizing child marriage, putting girls at risk of forced and early marriage and susceptible to sexual abuse, and not requiring decisions about children in divorce cases to be made in the best interests of the child.
    The draft law ignores article 2 of the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women by legalizing marital rape, Human Rights Watch said. The CEDAW committee, the body of international experts who review state compliance with the convention, in its February 28, 2014 review of Iraq’s reports, urged the government to “immediately withdraw the draft Jaafari personal status law.” The law also appears to violate the International Covenants on Civil and Political Rights and on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by granting fewer rights to certain individuals on the basis of their religion.
    The draft law also starkly contrasts article 14 of Iraq’s constitution, which prohibits “discrimination and distinction between Iraqis” and guarantees the equality of all Iraqis “without distinction to religion, faith, nationality, sex, opinion, economic or social status.”  Article 13 of Iraq’s constitution stipulates that it is the “supreme law” in Iraq and that “no law that contradicts this Constitution shall be enacted.”



    Hey, get that, Nouri's bill violates the law repeatedly but it also violates the Iraqi Constitution.

    Nouri who fancies himself a Constitutional expert.  Just Saturday, France24 was broadcasting their interview with Nouri.  Excerpt.


    Nouri al-Maliki: What Sadr says doesn't deserve to be commented [on].  Let's talk about something else. It's an individual who is a newcomer to politics.  He doesn't know the basic rules of politics.  The Constitution doesn't mean a thing for a Sadr.  He doesn't know what it means: 'Constitution.' Abide by the Constitution for a Sadr?  And those around him?  Seems awkward.


    Who's the newcomer?  What experience in politics did Nouri have before the US invaded Iraq?  None.

    By the way, cleric and movment leader Moqtada al-Sadr's followers?  All Iraq News notes they continued their protest today -- protests over Nouri's insults of Moqtada.

    We'll note this from Human Rights Watch's alert:



    A broad spectrum of Iraqi rights activists, Sunni and Shia religious leaders, and judges have criticized the draft law as discriminatory, violating religious texts, and, because the law would single out one sect, entrenching sectarian divisions in law. The Iraqi Women’s Network, an association of women’s rights groups, held protests on March 8, International Women’s Day, calling it a day of mourning in Iraq.
    “Iraq is in conflict and undergoing a breakdown of the rule of law,” Basma al-Khateeb, a women’s rights activist, told Human Rights Watch. “The passage of the Jaafari law sets the ground for legalized inequality.”



    I'm wondering why the Iraqi women are yet again let down by America?  Why news outlets still won't cover them or their issues?  Why a protest took place in Baghdad on Saturday, Iraqi feminists protested, and American feminists and feminist groups and feminist outlets can't say one damn word to help the Iraqi women?

    Good for Human Rights Watch and we've said that a lot in the last few years.

    They've stepped up to the plate on so many Iraqi issues.

    Nouri insulted them in the interview, just FYI., "Well, unluckily, the international organization for the human rights are never talking about what you said at the beginning.  They never say a word about the thousands of monthly casualties to the streets of Iraq. We never hear that organization criticize the terrorist organizations and name them as terrorists."


    If you were a cheap thug like Nouri, you'd insult anyone who exposed the truth about you as well.  If you were human garbage like Nouri al-Maliki, you'd also lie.

    And he is lying.  We don't have the space or the time to repeatedly demonstrate how much he lied about Human Rights Watch so we'll just address his little claim that violence is never called out (unless it's Nouri's violence).  Just last month, HRW issued a statement on the killing of Nouri's SWAT forces:

    Feb 5, 2014

    The execution-style killing of four members of Iraq’s SWAT forces, apparently by the ISIS armed group, is the latest atrocity in a campaign of widespread and systematic murder that amounts to crimes against humanity.

    Use the link to read it in full.  HRW notes the victims in report after report, they also do issue statements on the continued killings.

    For all that Nouri ignores, you can visit HRW's Iraq page.

    Also on human rights, All Iraq News notes, "The International Human Rights Committee announced the nomination of the former Iraqi Premier, Ayad Allawi, as the Co-President for its Intergovernmental Relations Council. "  Allawi is the Iraqi Al Gore.  He won the 2010 election but Nouri, Barack Obama and the government of Iran refused to let Allawi become the prime minister.


    And if you're not getting how useless the US news media is, let's  revisit John Barry's "'The Engame' Is A Well Researched, Highly Critical Look at U.S. Policy in Iraq" (Daily Beast):



    Washington has little political and no military influence over these developments [in Iraq]. As Michael Gordon and Bernard Trainor charge in their ambitious new history of the Iraq war, The Endgame, Obama's administration sacrificed political influence by failing in 2010 to insist that the results of Iraq’s first proper election be honored: "When the Obama administration acquiesced in the questionable judicial opinion that prevented Ayad Allawi's bloc, after it had won the most seats in 2010, from the first attempt at forming a new government, it undermined the prospects, however slim, for a compromise that might have led to a genuinely inclusive and cross-sectarian government."


    Barry wrote about it.  Few others did.  Not only didn't it get print or text coverage online, the famous author Michael R. Gordon (who's far from perfect and we've called him out many times) suddenly vanished from the TV dial.  He'd been on Charlie Rose so often, for example, he was practically a set fixture.  But this book?  No.  Charlie Rose wasn't interested.  After the book was published (and sold pretty well),  Ava and I noted the strange disappearing of Michael R. Gordon from the public affairs programs:

    Equally curious is who you don't see.  Gwen Ifill doesn't know a damn thing about foreign policy so asking her to moderate the segment was laughable.  Equally laughable was not going with a NewsHour foreign policy guest for the segment.
    In fact, we're thinking of one in particular: Michael R. Gordon of The New York Times.
    Gordon's appeared multiple times on The NewsHour.  Strangely, he wasn't booked for the segment on foreign policy last week.
    Why would that be?
    If you're wondering, he's not suddenly press shy.  To the contrary, he has a new book to sell, one he co-wrote with Bernard E. Trainor, The Endgame: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Iraq, from George W. Bush to Barack Obama. The book came out Tuesday.
    Generally, that means you can expect to see and hear Gordon all over PBS and NPR. Strangely, that has not been the case.  No NPR coverage last week of the book.  No come on The NewsHour for a discussion.  Frontline loved to have him on in the past but now now.  Charlie Rose?  He has appeared 12 times in the last ten years on Rose's PBS and Coca Cola program.  But he was no where to be found last week.
    Did Gordon show up at the PBS office party loaded on booze with little Gordon hanging out of his fly?
    No, he did something far worse than that.
    He dared to criticize Barack -- the ultimate media faux pas.



    If you're still not getting how awful the US news media is, let's look at 6 Tweets.  One is from an online operation run on a shoe string (I don't mean that as an insult, I mean they've got no real budget and depend on donations) and one is from a conglomerate with billions to spare.  Notice who focuses on what matters and who doesn't.




                  
    1. As long as Maliki is the "Leader" of , will never see light.
    2. I'm choked! Laws against women in Irak! Where is the equaliy of Rights? Iraq: Don’t Legalize Marriage for 9-Year-Olds
    3. Jaafari Personal Status draft law in Iraq is shameful-Iraq's international 'partners' should press govt to rescind it
    4. Seems clear that there's no good reason to listen to Dick Cheney or any of his minions from the Bush era. Why, in 1 word: Iraq.


    The first four deal with real issues.  Antiwar.com deals with a real issue.

    Then comes MSNBC's Joy Reid.  She wants to talk Iraq?

    No, she wants to play partisan bulls**t.

    Joy's so brave, isn't she, calling out Dick Cheney in 2014.  What a brave little fountain of strength she is.


    This is why MSNBC is worthless.

    Joy, who isn't an idiot or an MSNBC hag, is capable of so much more and she could be amplifying this threat against Iraqi girls and Iraqi mothers (again, it strips custody rights from mothers).

    But instead of helping, Joy thinks she's a comedian.  Well, now that is funny.

    Who gives a damn about Dick Cheney?

    Joy Reid, who would rather use her voice to note him than take the time to amplify the needs of Iraqi women.

    Again, the American media -- whether NPR, the talk shows of MSNBC or what have you -- is failing the people.  It's failing the world.

    For those who insist, "We can call out Condi and Dick Cheney and have time to cover what's happening in Iraq," then why haven't you?  You seem to think you're tired and useless (stolen) observations about events from a decade ago are needed or wanted.  No wonder your ratings are so low.

    And what do you do when your flaws are pointed out?

    Refuse to allow the criticism to be seen.  Around 3:00 pm EST, Ann left a comment on the hideous Morning Edition 'report' and they refused to post it.







    So NPR publishes Alice Fordham who covered the Iraq War for Rupert Murdoch and the comments are all about Bush?
    How typical and self-righteous as well as uninformed.
    I consider Bush a War Criminal.
    What's going on right now isn't about him. I'm not surprised Fordham plays the terrorist card, she learned it well under Murdoch.
    But, fellow Americans, if you could take a moment to stop babbling about Bush, go over to Human Rights Watch and read their reports on Anbar.
    Nouri al-Maliki is using collective punishment -- a War Crime. The Common Ills has pointed this out since the assault on Anbar began at the end of December.
    Nouri's forces are killing innocents including children and they're bombing hospitals.
    You may think you look really informed when you grumble about Bush in this story.
    Maybe to an echo chamber you do.
    But I'm a Green and you just look like people who want to talk but don't want to take the time required to learn the facts.
    This isn't 2004.
    There's a reason Senator Robert Menendez didn't want to arm Nouri and it took weeks of strong-arming him by the current White House for Nouri to get the Hellfire missiles he's now using on the people of Anbar.
    It is true that War Criminal Bush appointed Nouri in 2006.
    It's also true he lost the 2010 elections.
    For 8 months he refused to step down and with the support of the US and Iran, he didn't have to.
    Barack Obama is the one who ordered US officials to broker The Erbil Agreement which gives -- as The Common Ills points out repeatedly -- Nouri a second term by going around the Iraqi Constitution, concpets of democracy and the will of the Iraqi people.
    That contract was signed because there was no government for 8 months following the election. The contract dictated a power-sharing government. But after Nouri signed it, he refused to honor it and the White House that had promised the Kurds a power-sharing agreement, President Barack Obama who had personally called Ayad Allawi to go back into Parliament on its first meeting in months (November 2010)? They suddenly ignored their promises.
    NPR didn't report it accurately in real time. It's no surprise they're offering nonsense now.


      If you ever doubted Nouri al-Maliki's ability to lead, it's on full display right now.  Tomorrow is the big terrorism conference that Brett McGurk's endlessly praised Nouri for.  The State Dept's Brett has praised this effort to bring the region's countries together to address the issue.

      But today comes the news that two won't be participating.  NINA reports Qatar and Saudi Arabia have decided not to participate.  This decision comes after Saturday's broadcast of Nouri al-Maliki's interview where he slammed Qatar and Saudi Arabia repeatedly.  (See Saturday's "Nouri 'celebrates' International Women's Day" and "Iraq snapshot.")

      He couldn't even keep his big mouth shut until after the conference.



      Violence continued today in Iraq.

      National Iraqi News Agency reports 2 people were shot dead in Mosul, a Mosul roadside bombing injured five bodyguards of Hussein Juma'a ("Adviser of the head of Hajj and Umrah"), 2 suicide bombers took their own lives in Mosul and the lives of 3 police members with four more police left injured, Joint Operations Command announced they killed 4 suspects outside Falluja, an Anbar incident left Major General Ali Ghazi al-Hashemi "shot in his left foot," a battle in Mosul left 1 fighter dead, another injured and 1 federal police member dead, security forces in Ramadi say they killed 4 suspects and wounded six more, and a Sadr City roadside bombing left 2 people dead and four more injured.





















    • Read on ...
      Creative Commons License
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.